[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06e6c0b1e2624096038925bce787e7e8f0bb356d.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 04:03:03 +0000
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "thomas.lendacky@....com" <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] x86/microcode: Add a generic mechanism to declare
support for minrev
On Fri, 2022-10-14 at 13:09 -0700, Ashok Raj wrote:
> @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev,
> enum ucode_state tmp_ret = UCODE_OK;
> int bsp = boot_cpu_data.cpu_index;
> unsigned long val;
> + int minrev;
> ssize_t ret = 0;
>
> ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val);
> @@ -621,8 +622,14 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev,
> if (ret)
> goto put;
>
> - pr_err("Attempting late microcode loading - it is dangerous and taints the kernel.\n");
> - pr_err("You should switch to early loading, if possible.\n");
> + if (microcode_ops->check_minrev())
> + minrev = microcode_ops->check_minrev();
> +
> + if (!minrev) {
> + pr_err("Attempting late microcode loading - it is dangerous and taints the kernel.\n");
> + pr_err("You should switch to early loading, if possible.\n");
> + }
> +
Hi Ashok,
IIUC a variable in stack isn't initialized to 0 automatically. So looks if
check_minrev() callback is NULL, you will get an uninitialized 'minrev' in the
above if() statement check.
--
Thanks,
-Kai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists