linux-kernel - [PATCH 6.0 257/862] bpf: Use this_cpu_{inc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221019083301.406438627@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:25:44 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.0 257/862] bpf: Use this_cpu_{inc_return|dec} for prog->active

From: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit c89e843a11f1075d27684f6b42256213e4592383 ]

Both __this_cpu_inc_return() and __this_cpu_dec() are not preemption
safe and now migrate_disable() doesn't disable preemption, so the update
of prog-active is not atomic and in theory under fully preemptible kernel
recurisve prevention may do not work.

Fixing by using the preemption-safe and IRQ-safe variants.

Fixes: ca06f55b9002 ("bpf: Add per-program recursion prevention mechanism")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901061938.3789460-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index ff87e38af8a7..ad76940b02cc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *ru
 
 	run_ctx->saved_run_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx->run_ctx);
 
-	if (unlikely(__this_cpu_inc_return(*(prog->active)) != 1)) {
+	if (unlikely(this_cpu_inc_return(*(prog->active)) != 1)) {
 		inc_misses_counter(prog);
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ void notrace __bpf_prog_exit(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, struct bpf_tramp_
 	bpf_reset_run_ctx(run_ctx->saved_run_ctx);
 
 	update_prog_stats(prog, start);
-	__this_cpu_dec(*(prog->active));
+	this_cpu_dec(*(prog->active));
 	migrate_enable();
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
@@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_tramp_r
 	migrate_disable();
 	might_fault();
 
-	if (unlikely(__this_cpu_inc_return(*(prog->active)) != 1)) {
+	if (unlikely(this_cpu_inc_return(*(prog->active)) != 1)) {
 		inc_misses_counter(prog);
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ void notrace __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start,
 	bpf_reset_run_ctx(run_ctx->saved_run_ctx);
 
 	update_prog_stats(prog, start);
-	__this_cpu_dec(*(prog->active));
+	this_cpu_dec(*(prog->active));
 	migrate_enable();
 	rcu_read_unlock_trace();
 }
-- 
2.35.1