[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <7d97c52d-9917-4b3b-8ad2-7243566ae582@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:52:12 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
"Russell King" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"Gregory Clement" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
"Sudeep Holla" <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexandre.ghiti@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] arm: configs: spear6xx: Enable PL110 display controller
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022, at 15:48, Köry Maincent wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:38:45 -0400
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> On 19/10/2022 09:32, Köry Maincent wrote:
>> > From: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
>> >
>> > Enable the PL110 DRM driver, used by the spear600.
>> >
>> > CONFIG_I2C is dropped from the defconfig as it is selected by CONFIG_DRM.
>>
>> I2C as a user-selectable option should stay. Don't remove such
>> (user-selectable) top-level options just because something else selected it.
>
> As the CONFIG_DRM selects it, the "make savedefconfig" removes it by default.
> Why keeping something that is already automatically enabled by CONFIG_DRM?
It's something that DRM probably should not select, so if this
ever gets fixed in DRM, you get a broken build. Just leaving
the line in there is harmless.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists