[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202210182215.19844E9F21@keescook>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 22:16:15 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Joao Moreira <joao@...rdrivepizza.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ibt: Implement FineIBT
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:09:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 11:09:13AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_FINEIBT
> > > +/*
> > > + * kCFI FineIBT
> > > + *
> > > + * __cfi_\func: __cfi_\func:
> > > + * movl $0x12345678,%eax endbr64 // 4
> >
> > kCFI emits endbr64 here first too ...
> >
> > > + * nop subl $0x12345678,%r10d // 7
> > > + * nop jz 1f // 2
> > > + * nop ud2 // 2
> > > + * nop 1: nop // 1
> > > + * nop
> > > + * nop
> > > + * nop
> > > + * nop
> > > + * nop
> > > + * nop
> > > + * nop
>
> It does not; it does emit ENDBR at the start of the regular symbol
> though:
Oh duh, sorry, yes.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists