| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <0000000000002a6cba05eb5c7fbd@google.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 22:29:46 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+cb1fdea540b46f0ce394@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: anton@...era.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] possible deadlock in map_mft_record
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: bbed346d5a96 Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17c6e19a880000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=3a4a45d2d827c1e
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=cb1fdea540b46f0ce394
compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
userspace arch: arm64
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e8e91bc79312/disk-bbed346d.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c1cb3fb3b77e/vmlinux-bbed346d.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+cb1fdea540b46f0ce394@...kaller.appspotmail.com
ntfs: (device loop3): is_boot_sector_ntfs(): Invalid boot sector checksum.
ntfs: volume version 3.1.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.3/9828 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff00010ca1f5d0 (&ni->mrec_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: map_mft_record+0x40/0xfc fs/ntfs/mft.c:154
but task is already holding lock:
ffff00010ca1f540 (&rl->lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: ntfs_truncate+0xa8/0xf6c fs/ntfs/inode.c:2371
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&rl->lock){++++}-{3:3}:
down_read+0x5c/0x78 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1499
ntfs_read_block+0x2d0/0x1110 fs/ntfs/aops.c:248
ntfs_read_folio+0x594/0x758 fs/ntfs/aops.c:436
filemap_read_folio+0x68/0x33c mm/filemap.c:2394
do_read_cache_folio+0x1c8/0x588 mm/filemap.c:3519
do_read_cache_page mm/filemap.c:3561 [inline]
read_cache_page+0x40/0x178 mm/filemap.c:3570
read_mapping_page include/linux/pagemap.h:756 [inline]
ntfs_map_page fs/ntfs/aops.h:75 [inline]
ntfs_sync_mft_mirror+0xb4/0x109c fs/ntfs/mft.c:480
write_mft_record_nolock+0x814/0xc70 fs/ntfs/mft.c:787
write_mft_record+0xe4/0x230 fs/ntfs/mft.h:95
__ntfs_write_inode+0x32c/0x554 fs/ntfs/inode.c:3043
ntfs_write_inode+0x3c/0x4c fs/ntfs/super.c:2655
write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1440 [inline]
__writeback_single_inode+0x240/0x2e4 fs/fs-writeback.c:1652
writeback_sb_inodes+0x3e4/0x85c fs/fs-writeback.c:1865
wb_writeback+0x198/0x328 fs/fs-writeback.c:2039
wb_do_writeback+0xc8/0x384 fs/fs-writeback.c:2182
wb_workfn+0x70/0x15c fs/fs-writeback.c:2222
process_one_work+0x2d8/0x504 kernel/workqueue.c:2289
worker_thread+0x340/0x610 kernel/workqueue.c:2436
kthread+0x12c/0x158 kernel/kthread.c:376
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:860
-> #0 (&ni->mrec_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666
__mutex_lock_common+0xd4/0xca8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
map_mft_record+0x40/0xfc fs/ntfs/mft.c:154
ntfs_truncate+0xd8/0xf6c fs/ntfs/inode.c:2376
ntfs_truncate_vfs fs/ntfs/inode.c:2855 [inline]
ntfs_setattr+0x1ac/0x228 fs/ntfs/inode.c:2907
notify_change+0x758/0x7f0 fs/attr.c:420
do_truncate+0x108/0x150 fs/open.c:65
vfs_truncate+0x1dc/0x24c fs/open.c:111
do_sys_truncate+0x94/0x140 fs/open.c:134
__do_sys_truncate fs/open.c:146 [inline]
__se_sys_truncate fs/open.c:144 [inline]
__arm64_sys_truncate+0x20/0x30 fs/open.c:144
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&rl->lock);
lock(&ni->mrec_lock);
lock(&rl->lock);
lock(&ni->mrec_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by syz-executor.3/9828:
#0: ffff0001067af460 (sb_writers#23){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x64 fs/namespace.c:393
#1: ffff00010ca1f8b0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#32){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:756 [inline]
#1: ffff00010ca1f8b0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#32){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_truncate+0xf4/0x150 fs/open.c:63
#2: ffff00010ca1f540 (&rl->lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: ntfs_truncate+0xa8/0xf6c fs/ntfs/inode.c:2371
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 9828 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/30/2022
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x1c4/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:156
show_stack+0x2c/0x54 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:163
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x104/0x16c lib/dump_stack.c:106
dump_stack+0x1c/0x58 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_circular_bug+0x2c4/0x2c8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2053
check_noncircular+0x14c/0x154 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666
__mutex_lock_common+0xd4/0xca8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
map_mft_record+0x40/0xfc fs/ntfs/mft.c:154
ntfs_truncate+0xd8/0xf6c fs/ntfs/inode.c:2376
ntfs_truncate_vfs fs/ntfs/inode.c:2855 [inline]
ntfs_setattr+0x1ac/0x228 fs/ntfs/inode.c:2907
notify_change+0x758/0x7f0 fs/attr.c:420
do_truncate+0x108/0x150 fs/open.c:65
vfs_truncate+0x1dc/0x24c fs/open.c:111
do_sys_truncate+0x94/0x140 fs/open.c:134
__do_sys_truncate fs/open.c:146 [inline]
__se_sys_truncate fs/open.c:144 [inline]
__arm64_sys_truncate+0x20/0x30 fs/open.c:144
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists