lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2022 19:39:02 +0300
From:   Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: v5.19 & v6.0 stable backport request

On Wed, 19 Oct 2022, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 08:55:55AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 02:02:08PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> > 
>> > Hello stable team, please backport these two commits to stable kernels
>> > v5.19 and v6.0:
>> > 
>> > 4e78d6023c15 ("drm/i915/bios: Validate fp_timing terminator presence")
>> 
>> Does not apply to 5.19.y, can you provide a working backport?
>> 
>> > d3a7051841f0 ("drm/i915/bios: Use hardcoded fp_timing size for generating LFP data pointers")
>> 
>> Queued up to both trees now, thanks.
>
> No, wait, that breaks the build!
>
> How did you test this?  I'm dropping both of these now.
>
> Please resubmit a set of tested patches if you wish to have them applied
> to the tree.  These were obviously not even attempted, which just wastes
> all of our time :(

Apologies, misunderstanding on my part about them being applicable
as-is.

Ville has provided the backports. Thanks!


BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ