[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pmenhiop.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 19:39:02 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: v5.19 & v6.0 stable backport request
On Wed, 19 Oct 2022, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 08:55:55AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 02:02:08PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello stable team, please backport these two commits to stable kernels
>> > v5.19 and v6.0:
>> >
>> > 4e78d6023c15 ("drm/i915/bios: Validate fp_timing terminator presence")
>>
>> Does not apply to 5.19.y, can you provide a working backport?
>>
>> > d3a7051841f0 ("drm/i915/bios: Use hardcoded fp_timing size for generating LFP data pointers")
>>
>> Queued up to both trees now, thanks.
>
> No, wait, that breaks the build!
>
> How did you test this? I'm dropping both of these now.
>
> Please resubmit a set of tested patches if you wish to have them applied
> to the tree. These were obviously not even attempted, which just wastes
> all of our time :(
Apologies, misunderstanding on my part about them being applicable
as-is.
Ville has provided the backports. Thanks!
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists