lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:18:22 +0000
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     Rock Chiu <rock.chiu@...adetech.corp-partner.google.com>,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
        Jason Yen <jason.yen@...adetech.corp-partner.google.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
        Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Philip Chen <philipchen@...omium.org>,
        Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ps8640: Add back the 50 ms mystery delay
 after HPD

Quoting Douglas Anderson (2022-10-17 12:18:51)
> Back in commit 826cff3f7ebb ("drm/bridge: parade-ps8640: Enable
> runtime power management") we removed a mysterious 50 ms delay because
> "Parade's support [couldn't] explain what the delay [was] for".
>
> While I'm always a fan of removing mysterious delays, I suspect that
> we need this mysterious delay to avoid some problems.
>
> Specifically, what I found recently is that on sc7180-trogdor-homestar
> sometimes the AUX backlight wasn't initializing properly. Some
> debugging showed that the drm_dp_dpcd_read() function that the AUX
> backlight driver was calling was returning bogus data about 1% of the
> time when I booted up. This confused
> drm_panel_dp_aux_backlight(). From continued debugging:
> - If I retried the read then the read worked just fine.
> - If I added a loop to perform the same read that
>   drm_panel_dp_aux_backlight() was doing 30 times at bootup I could
>   see that some percentage of the time the first read would give bogus
>   data but all 29 additional reads would always be fine.
> - If I added a large delay _after_ powering on the panel but before
>   powering on PS8640 I could still reproduce the problem.
> - If I added a delay after PS8640 powered on then I couldn't reproduce
>   the problem.
> - I couldn't reproduce the problem on a board with the same panel but
>   the ti-sn65dsi86 bridge chip.
>
> To me, the above indicated that there was a problem with PS8640 and
> not the panel.
>
> I don't really have any insight into what's going on in the MCU, but
> my best guess is that when the MCU itself sees the HPD go high that it
> does some AUX transfers itself and this is confusing things.
>
> Let's go back and add back in the mysterious 50 ms delay. We only want
> to do this the first time we see HPD go high after booting the MCU,
> not every time we double-check HPD.
>
> With this, the backlight initializes reliably on homestar.
>
> Fixes: 826cff3f7ebb ("drm/bridge: parade-ps8640: Enable runtime power management")
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ