[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x494jvztyx5.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:07:34 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Venkataramanan\, Anirudh" <anirudh.venkataramanan@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] fs/aio: Replace kmap{,_atomic}() with kmap_local_page()
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com> writes:
> On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 5:41:21 PM CEST Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com> writes:
>>
>> > The use of kmap() and kmap_atomic() are being deprecated in favor of
>> > kmap_local_page().
>> >
>> > There are two main problems with kmap(): (1) It comes with an overhead as
>> > the mapping space is restricted and protected by a global lock for
>> > synchronization and (2) it also requires global TLB invalidation when the
>> > kmap’s pool wraps and it might block when the mapping space is fully
>> > utilized until a slot becomes available.
>> >
>> > With kmap_local_page() the mappings are per thread, CPU local, can take
>> > page faults, and can be called from any context (including interrupts).
>> > It is faster than kmap() in kernels with HIGHMEM enabled. Furthermore,
>> > the tasks can be preempted and, when they are scheduled to run again, the
>> > kernel virtual addresses are restored and still valid.
>> >
>> > Since its use in fs/aio.c is safe everywhere, it should be preferred.
>>
>> That sentence is very ambiguous. I don't know what "its" refers to, and
>> I'm not sure what "safe" means in this context.
>
> I'm sorry for not being clearer.
>
> "its use" means "the use of kmap_local_page()". Few lines above you may also
> see "It is faster", meaning "kmap_local_page() is faster".
Got it, thanks.
> The "safety" is a very concise way to assert that I've checked, by code
> inspection and by testing (as it is better detailed some lines below) that
> these conversions (1) don't break any of the rules of use of local mapping
> when converting kmap() (please read highmem.rst about these) and (2) the call
> sites of kmap_atomic() didn't rely on its side effects (pagefaults disable and
> potential preemption disables).
OK, good. I agree that the aio code wasn't relying on the side effects of
kmap_atomic.
> Therefore, you may read it as it was: "The use of kmap_local_page() in fs/
> aio.c has been carefully checked to assure that the conversions won't break
> the code, therefore the newer API is preferred".
>
> I hope it makes my argument clearer.
Yes, thank you for explaining!
-Jeff
>
>>
>> The patch looks okay to me.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
>>
>
> Thank you so much for the "Reviewed-by" tag.
>
> Regards,
>
> Fabio
Powered by blists - more mailing lists