[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1BuLyxEKLIAgF+5@shikoro>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:37:51 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa-dev@...g-engineering.com>
To: Jason Gerecke <killertofu@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ping Cheng <pinglinux@...il.com>,
"Tobita, Tatsunosuke" <tatsunosuke.tobita@...om.com>,
Jason Gerecke <jason.gerecke@...om.com>,
Ping Cheng <ping.cheng@...om.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: Use u8 type in i2c transfer calls
> I spent a little time trying to put together a Coccinelle script to
> take care of everything but I eventually realized the size of the task
> was larger than I was comfortable with. In particular, even though I
> might be able to put together a script, I worry I don't have a good
> way to test the resulting treewide changes to avoid regression.
The coccinelle scripts are one thing. I am quite familiar with it, so I
regard this as "work but doable". My main headache is that I am not sure
about the best way to upstream the result. I'd like to avoid a flag-day
where all drivers across all subsystems need to be converted, but I
don't really see a way around it. Preparing such a branch and make sure
it does not regress is quite some work on a moving target.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists