linux-kernel - Re: v5.19 & v6.0 stable backport request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y0+h++6NReFAZhrv@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:06:35 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: v5.19 & v6.0 stable backport request

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 08:55:55AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 02:02:08PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > 
> > Hello stable team, please backport these two commits to stable kernels
> > v5.19 and v6.0:
> > 
> > 4e78d6023c15 ("drm/i915/bios: Validate fp_timing terminator presence")
> 
> Does not apply to 5.19.y, can you provide a working backport?
> 
> > d3a7051841f0 ("drm/i915/bios: Use hardcoded fp_timing size for generating LFP data pointers")
> 
> Queued up to both trees now, thanks.

No, wait, that breaks the build!

How did you test this?  I'm dropping both of these now.

Please resubmit a set of tested patches if you wish to have them applied
to the tree.  These were obviously not even attempted, which just wastes
all of our time :(

greg k-h