[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221019180807.6dac24a0@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:08:07 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mtd tree with the mtd-fixes
tree
Hi Rafał,
On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 07:31:57 +0200 Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl> wrote:
>
> this isn't exactly the correct fix, of_node_get() is still needed.
>
> I'll make sure we let Linus know about this conflict (and solution) when
> sending 6.2 pull request.
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> index 07249af4f890..20fcedc3021e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static void mtd_check_of_node(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> if (!mtd_is_partition(mtd))
> return;
>
> - parent_dn = mtd_get_of_node(mtd->parent);
> + parent_dn = of_node_get(mtd_get_of_node(mtd->parent));
> if (!parent_dn)
> return;
>
Thanks for checking. I have added that to my resolution for tomorrow
onward.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists