[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f2d2032-8859-4388-489a-ba5cd2cee432@foss.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:11:20 +0100
From: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@...s.arm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
suzuki.poulose@....com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
mike.leach@...aro.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/13] perf test: Add build infra for perf test tools
for CoreSight tests
On 10/10/22 14:54, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 08:02:29AM +0100, Carsten Haitzler escreveu:
>> On 10/7/22 13:44, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Em Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 12:34:51PM +0100, Carsten Haitzler escreveu:
>>>> On 10/6/22 13:58, Leo Yan wrote:
>>>> oh sorry - indeed i didn't see this problem coming after fixing the
>>>> conflicts. i've got an update of the patches that fix that. should i just
>>>> send through the 2 updates patches as a v10 or the whole series?
>
>>> No need, I did some fixes taking into account the comments on this
>>> thread, we can go on and fix things from what I have now at
>>> acme/perf/core, which I'll send to Linus today.
>
>> oh cool. i'll let patches sit for now - let me know if there's anything you
>> want/need from me.
>
> Not right now, I'm now just waiting for Linus to merge what I sent, then
> you can continue from upstream.
I'm not sure what you have sent to Linus? The patch series? Specific
patches?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists