[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221019083250.634664654@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:21:41 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 6.0 014/862] io_uring/rw: dont lose short results on io_setup_async_rw()
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
commit c278d9f8ac0db5590909e6d9e85b5ca2b786704f upstream.
If a retry io_setup_async_rw() fails we lose result from the first
io_iter_do_read(), which is a problem mostly for streams/sockets.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0e8d20cebe5fc9c96ed268463c394237daabc384.1664235732.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
io_uring/rw.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/io_uring/rw.c
+++ b/io_uring/rw.c
@@ -794,10 +794,12 @@ int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsign
iov_iter_restore(&s->iter, &s->iter_state);
ret2 = io_setup_async_rw(req, iovec, s, true);
- if (ret2)
- return ret2;
-
iovec = NULL;
+ if (ret2) {
+ ret = ret > 0 ? ret : ret2;
+ goto done;
+ }
+
io = req->async_data;
s = &io->s;
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists