linux-kernel - [PATCH 6.0 015/862] io_uring/net: fix fast_iov assignment in io_setup_async

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221019083250.679094053@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:21:42 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 6.0 015/862] io_uring/net: fix fast_iov assignment in io_setup_async_msg()

From: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>

commit 3e4cb6ebbb2bad201c1186bc0b7e8cf41dd7f7e6 upstream.

I hit a very bad problem during my tests of SENDMSG_ZC.
BUG(); in first_iovec_segment() triggered very easily.
The problem was io_setup_async_msg() in the partial retry case,
which seems to happen more often with _ZC.

iov_iter_iovec_advance() may change i->iov in order to have i->iov_offset
being only relative to the first element.

Which means kmsg->msg.msg_iter.iov is no longer the
same as kmsg->fast_iov.

But this would rewind the copy to be the start of
async_msg->fast_iov, which means the internal
state of sync_msg->msg.msg_iter is inconsitent.

I tested with 5 vectors with length like this 4, 0, 64, 20, 8388608
and got a short writes with:
- ret=2675244 min_ret=8388692 => remaining 5713448 sr->done_io=2675244
- ret=-EAGAIN => io_uring_poll_arm
- ret=4911225 min_ret=5713448 => remaining 802223  sr->done_io=7586469
- ret=-EAGAIN => io_uring_poll_arm
- ret=802223  min_ret=802223  => res=8388692

While this was easily triggered with SENDMSG_ZC (queued for 6.1),
it was a potential problem starting with 7ba89d2af17aa879dda30f5d5d3f152e587fc551
in 5.18 for IORING_OP_RECVMSG.
And also with 4c3c09439c08b03d9503df0ca4c7619c5842892e in 5.19
for IORING_OP_SENDMSG.

However 257e84a5377fbbc336ff563833a8712619acce56 introduced the critical
code into io_setup_async_msg() in 5.11.

Fixes: 7ba89d2af17aa ("io_uring: ensure recv and recvmsg handle MSG_WAITALL correctly")
Fixes: 257e84a5377fb ("io_uring: refactor sendmsg/recvmsg iov managing")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b2e7be246e2fb173520862b0c7098e55767567a2.1664436949.git.metze@samba.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 io_uring/net.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/io_uring/net.c
+++ b/io_uring/net.c
@@ -165,8 +165,10 @@ static int io_setup_async_msg(struct io_
 	memcpy(async_msg, kmsg, sizeof(*kmsg));
 	async_msg->msg.msg_name = &async_msg->addr;
 	/* if were using fast_iov, set it to the new one */
-	if (!async_msg->free_iov)
-		async_msg->msg.msg_iter.iov = async_msg->fast_iov;
+	if (!kmsg->free_iov) {
+		size_t fast_idx = kmsg->msg.msg_iter.iov - kmsg->fast_iov;
+		async_msg->msg.msg_iter.iov = &async_msg->fast_iov[fast_idx];
+	}

 	return -EAGAIN;
 }