linux-kernel - [PATCH 6.0 304/862] selftests/bpf: Adapt cgroup effective query uapi change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221019083303.438903129@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:26:31 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.0 304/862] selftests/bpf: Adapt cgroup effective query uapi change

From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit d2aa993b7d9de6deeb1df6c9a6b9b6193c337cc6 ]

The attach flags is meaningless for effective query and
its value will always be set as 0 during effective query.
Root cg's effective progs is always its attached progs,
so we use non-effective query to get its progs count and
attach flags. And we don't need the remain attach flags
check.

Fixes: b79c9fc9551b ("bpf: implement BPF_PROG_QUERY for BPF_LSM_CGROUP")
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921104604.2340580-4-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_link.c | 11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_link.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_link.c
index 9e6e6aad347c..15093a69510e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_link.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_link.c
@@ -71,10 +71,9 @@ void serial_test_cgroup_link(void)
 
 	ping_and_check(cg_nr, 0);
 
-	/* query the number of effective progs and attach flags in root cg */
+	/* query the number of attached progs and attach flags in root cg */
 	err = bpf_prog_query(cgs[0].fd, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS,
-			     BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE, &attach_flags, NULL,
-			     &prog_cnt);
+			     0, &attach_flags, NULL, &prog_cnt);
 	CHECK_FAIL(err);
 	CHECK_FAIL(attach_flags != BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI);
 	if (CHECK(prog_cnt != 1, "effect_cnt", "exp %d, got %d\n", 1, prog_cnt))
@@ -85,17 +84,15 @@ void serial_test_cgroup_link(void)
 			     BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE, NULL, NULL,
 			     &prog_cnt);
 	CHECK_FAIL(err);
-	CHECK_FAIL(attach_flags != BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI);
 	if (CHECK(prog_cnt != cg_nr, "effect_cnt", "exp %d, got %d\n",
 		  cg_nr, prog_cnt))
 		goto cleanup;
 
 	/* query the effective prog IDs in last cg */
 	err = bpf_prog_query(cgs[last_cg].fd, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS,
-			     BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE, &attach_flags,
-			     prog_ids, &prog_cnt);
+			     BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE, NULL, prog_ids,
+			     &prog_cnt);
 	CHECK_FAIL(err);
-	CHECK_FAIL(attach_flags != BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI);
 	if (CHECK(prog_cnt != cg_nr, "effect_cnt", "exp %d, got %d\n",
 		  cg_nr, prog_cnt))
 		goto cleanup;
-- 
2.35.1