linux-kernel - [PATCH 6.0 659/862] =?UTF-8?q?ARM/dma-mapp=D1=96ng:=20dont=20override=20->dma=5Fcohe?= =?UTF-8?q?rent=20when=20set=20from=20a=20bus=20notifier?=

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221019083319.087440003@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:32:26 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.0 659/862] =?UTF-8?q?ARM/dma-mapp=D1=96ng:=20dont=20override=20->dma=5Fcohe?= =?UTF-8?q?rent=20when=20set=20from=20a=20bus=20notifier?=

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

[ Upstream commit 49bc8bebae79c8516cb12f91818f3a7907e3ebce ]

Commit ae626eb97376 ("ARM/dma-mapping: use dma-direct unconditionally")
caused a regression on the mvebu platform, wherein devices that are
dma-coherent are marked as dma-noncoherent, because although
mvebu_hwcc_notifier() after that commit still marks then as coherent,
the arm_coherent_dma_ops() function, which is called later, overwrites
this setting, since it is being called from drivers/of/device.c with
coherency parameter determined by of_dma_is_coherent(), and the
device-trees do not declare the 'dma-coherent' property.

Fix this by defaulting never clearing the dma_coherent flag in
arm_coherent_dma_ops().

Fixes: ae626eb97376 ("ARM/dma-mapping: use dma-direct unconditionally")
Reported-by: Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Tested-by: Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 089c9c644cce..bfc7476f1411 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -1769,8 +1769,16 @@ static void arm_teardown_iommu_dma_ops(struct device *dev) { }
 void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
 			const struct iommu_ops *iommu, bool coherent)
 {
-	dev->archdata.dma_coherent = coherent;
-	dev->dma_coherent = coherent;
+	/*
+	 * Due to legacy code that sets the ->dma_coherent flag from a bus
+	 * notifier we can't just assign coherent to the ->dma_coherent flag
+	 * here, but instead have to make sure we only set but never clear it
+	 * for now.
+	 */
+	if (coherent) {
+		dev->archdata.dma_coherent = true;
+		dev->dma_coherent = true;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Don't override the dma_ops if they have already been set. Ideally
-- 
2.35.1