[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221019094015.832398-1-tegongkang@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:40:15 +0900
From: Kang Minchul <tegongkang@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@...il.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
Sidong Yang <realwakka@...il.com>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kang Minchul <tegongkang@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] staging: pi433: Use div64_u64 instead of do_div
This commit removes warning generated by cocci as follows:
do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
Using div64_u64 instead of do_div can avoid potential truncation.
Signed-off-by: Kang Minchul <tegongkang@...il.com>
---
drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c b/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c
index 8c7fab6a46bb..683dd94489f9 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c
@@ -252,11 +252,11 @@ int rf69_set_deviation(struct spi_device *spi, u32 deviation)
// calculat f step
f_step = F_OSC * factor;
- do_div(f_step, 524288); // 524288 = 2^19
+ div64_u64(f_step, 524288); // 524288 = 2^19
// calculate register settings
f_reg = deviation * factor;
- do_div(f_reg, f_step);
+ div64_u64(f_reg, f_step);
msb = (f_reg & 0xff00) >> 8;
lsb = (f_reg & 0xff);
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ int rf69_set_frequency(struct spi_device *spi, u32 frequency)
// calculat f step
f_step = F_OSC * factor;
- do_div(f_step, 524288); // 524288 = 2^19
+ div64_u64(f_step, 524288); // 524288 = 2^19
// check input value
f_max = div_u64(f_step * 8388608, factor);
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ int rf69_set_frequency(struct spi_device *spi, u32 frequency)
// calculate reg settings
f_reg = frequency * factor;
- do_div(f_reg, f_step);
+ div64_u64(f_reg, f_step);
msb = (f_reg & 0xff0000) >> 16;
mid = (f_reg & 0xff00) >> 8;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists