linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 0/3]] Add TDX Guest Attestation support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <95240a74-0c49-d051-a609-775c48b22bf5@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2022 10:08:36 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
        Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>,
        Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
        marcelo.cerri@...onical.com, tim.gardner@...onical.com,
        khalid.elmously@...onical.com, philip.cox@...onical.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 0/3]] Add TDX Guest Attestation support

On 10/19/22 21:58, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> Following are the details of the patch set:
> 
> Patch 1/3 -> Preparatory patch for adding attestation support.
> Patch 2/3 -> Adds user interface driver to support attestation.
> Patch 3/3 -> Adds selftest support for TDREPORT feature.
> 
> Commit log history is maintained in the individual patches.

I really appreciate when folks come out and say what they think should
be done with the series.  Is this ready to be applied?  Or, is it just
being thrown over the fence in the general direction of the maintainers
with the hope that they'll divine its true purpose?