linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] spi: pxa2xx: Remove no more needed PCI ID table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y1GJL8/YfeoUy8wB@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2022 18:45:19 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] spi: pxa2xx: Remove no more needed PCI ID table

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 08:41:43PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> Okay, would it work for you if we check the named resource and only if it's
> found take a property? In such case we can guarantee (AFAICS) that the 3rd
> parties (like unknown firmware) won't mess up with the driver.

Not sure I quite get what you're proposing here but I *think* so,
assuming you mean checking the values if the property is present (and
error out if the property isn't there at all and you're instantiating
via a MFD rather than direct PCI/DT binding I guess)?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)