linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 03/11] staging: r8188eu: remove {} for single statement blocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a50460e1507621b29a7901cc4ff9501b172417db.1666299151.git.drv@mailo.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Oct 2022 02:57:47 +0530
From:   Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
To:     outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, Larry.Finger@...inger.net,
        phil@...lpotter.co.uk, paskripkin@...il.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kumarpraveen@...ux.microsoft.com,
        saurabh.truth@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 03/11] staging: r8188eu: remove {} for single statement
 blocks

As per the Linux kernel coding-style guidelines, there is no need to
use {} for single statement blocks. Issue flagged by checkpatch script.

Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
---

Changes in v4:
   -- None.

Changes in v3:
   -- None.

Changes in v1 [actually v2]:
   1. Improve patch description language to make it simpler. Feedback received
      from julia.lawall@...ia.fr


 drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
index d4059f0fc362..b418cbc307b3 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
@@ -649,9 +649,8 @@ void *scdb_findEntry(struct adapter *priv, unsigned char *ip_addr)
 	hash = __nat25_network_hash(addr);
 	db = priv->nethash[hash];
 	while (db) {
-		if (!memcmp(db->networkAddr, addr, MAX_NETWORK_ADDR_LEN)) {
+		if (!memcmp(db->networkAddr, addr, MAX_NETWORK_ADDR_LEN))
 			return (void *)db;
-		}

 		db = db->next_hash;
 	}
--
2.30.2