[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6351e043e52bf_4da329422@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 16:56:51 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
"Ira Weiny" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@...nel.org>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC: <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@...olabs.net>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>,
"kernel test robot" <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 01/12] cxl/core: Remove duplicate declaration of
devm_cxl_iomap_block()
Robert Richter wrote:
> The function devm_cxl_iomap_block() is only used in the core
> code. There are two declarations in header files of it, in
> drivers/cxl/core/core.h and drivers/cxl/cxl.h. Remove its unused
> declaration in drivers/cxl/cxl.h.
>
> Fixing build error in regs.c found by kernel test robot by including
> "core.h" there.
Fixes a build error only with the new code in this series, or do you
have a config where this fails with current mainline?
Assuming the former, this is applied for v6.2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists