lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:15:08 +0800
From:   高严凯 <gaoyankaigeren@...il.com>
To:     Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
Cc:     Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ufs: core: Disable auto h8 before ssu

Dear ALL
Do you agree this patch? I'd like to hear your opinion about this.

Thanks.

高严凯 <gaoyankaigeren@...il.com> 于2022年10月14日周五 18:15写道:
>
> hi Bean
> Yes, This is the time from when the system enters idle to when auto h8
> is issued.
> This patch is just to ensure that there is no continuous action of
> "auto h8 exit" before dme h8 enter, it has nothing to do with idle
> time.
> The reason I want to ensure this order is because when there is an
> action of "auto h8 exit", most devices take a certain amount of time
> to get the state ready.
> Immediately after the action of "auto h8 exit" is completed and "dme
> h8 enter" is followed, the device will be abnormal.
> And I think it's more of a common patch for all platforms, Patch can
> adapt different vendors,and align to ufshcd_auto_hibern8_enable in
> __ufshcd_wl_resume.
>
> Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com> 于2022年10月14日周五 13:48写道:
> >
> > On Fri, 2022-10-14 at 10:44 +0800, 高严凯 wrote:
> > > " UFSHCI has idle time before bringing Link into hibern8 mode, " I
> > > think  ufs put the link to h8 during the time
> >
> >
> > no,  it is ufs controller. see the ufshci spec:
> >
> > "Auto-Hibern8 Idle Timer Value (AH8ITV): This is the timer that UFS
> > subsystem must be idle before UFS host *controller* may put UniPro link
> > into Hibernate state autonomously. The idle timer value is multiplied
> > by the indicated timer scale to yield an absolute timer value. ....
> >
> > ...
> > Any non-zero value will enable Auto-Hibernate idle timer.
> > UFS host controller shall put Unipro link out of Hibernate state when
> > the link communication is required. The mechanism to decide when the
> > Unipro link needs to become active is host controller specific
> > implementation, and is transparent to the software."
> >
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ