[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHJEyKXnSdgzGVaFX6ayU3DusETOLZRcpKJJ9ZO_76ofbBTacA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:08:18 +0100
From: Tanju Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rts5208: Replace instances of udelay by usleep_range
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 5:40 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 14:04 +0000, Tanjuate Brunostar wrote:
> > Replace the use of udelay by usleep_range as suggested by checkpatch:
> >
> > CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst
> > + udelay(30);
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c
> []
> > @@ -3235,7 +3235,7 @@ static int ms_write_multiple_pages(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u16 old_blk,
> > return STATUS_FAIL;
> > }
> >
> > - udelay(30);
> > + usleep_range(30, 30);
>
> >This isn't useful. Please read the Documentation/timers.
Yes I read the documentation and realized the changes were not necessary
Powered by blists - more mailing lists