linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-next] perf: Use strscpy() instead of strlcpy()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y1EZbJGoIFY2NX1V@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2022 11:48:28 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     cuijinpeng666@...il.com
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, namhyung@...nel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@....com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] perf: Use strscpy() instead of strlcpy()

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 08:54:11AM +0000, cuijinpeng666@...il.com wrote:
> From: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@....com.cn>
> 
> The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@....com.cn>
> ---

Please ignore based on this response:
	https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y1EVnZS9BalesrC1@kroah.com