lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHJEyKUsZ-V0waEwBEy67g+MNMR29MGJbBx3qCA4axKyPk9RGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2022 11:15:38 +0100
From:   Tanju Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@...il.com>
To:     Nam Cao <namcaov@...il.com>
Cc:     greg@...ah.com, forest@...ttletooquiet.net,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: vt6655: Fix Lines should not end with a '('

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:35 PM Nam Cao <namcaov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 07:20:11PM +0000, Tanjuate Brunostar wrote:
> > Code style warnings reported by checkpatch.
> > Improve the layout of a function header:
> > Put the first parameter immediately after the '(' and align the other
> > parameters underneath it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tanjuate Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@...il.com>
> >
> > ---
> > v2: put static and void on the same line and adjusted the indentation as
> > suggested by Greg KH
>
> I think he meant putting "static" and "void" and also function name on
> the same line.
>
Oh I will do this now. thanks

> Additionally, I think your patch introduces new checkpatch problems. Did
> you run checkpatch.pl on your patch?
>
> Best regards,
> Nam
>
Yes I did. the checkpatch says this:
Alignment should match open parenthesis
#89: FILE: drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c:89:
+static void s_vFillRTSHead(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
+               unsigned char byPktType,

The only way to resolve this would be to add white space which would
generate another checkpatch problem. how do i fix this please?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ