[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <476b0f0-2b9-a9c1-f5c-67d6b6158d0@inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:59:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To: Tanju Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@...il.com>
cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: Request for assistance
On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, Tanju Brunostar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:10 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:00:59AM +0000, Ubuntu wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I have a diffictly deciding where exactly to split a long line of code. for example, this line of code is too long
> > >
> > > uCTSTime = bb_get_frame_time(pDevice->preamble_type, byPktType, 14, pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate);
> > >
> > > if i spit it this way:
> > > uCTSTime =
> > > bb_get_frame_time(pDevice->preamble_type, byPktType, 14, pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate);
> > >
> > > It does not help as the second line is still too long. I considered doing it this way instead:
> > > uCTSTime = bb_get_frame_time(pDevice->preamble_type, byPktType, 14,
> > > pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate);
> > > But i did this on one of my patches and i was told it is not advisable to split a line between
> > > parenthesis '(' and ')'
> >
> > Who told you that?
I did, but the context was different. It's fine to have a newline among
the of arguments of a function call. It's less desirable to put a newline
in the middle of (A | B), it if can be avoided.
julia
> >
> > You are close, the code should look like:
> > uCTSTime = bb_get_frame_time(pDevice->preamble_type, byPktType, 14,
> > pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate);
> >
> > Like millions of other lines in the kernel source tree. When in doubt,
> > look at existing implementations.
> >
> > hope this helps,
> >
> > greg k-h
> Thank you for the clarification
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists