[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <166627101165.162941.2701658237902573676.b4-ty@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 06:03:31 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
Ye Bin <yebin@...weicloud.com>, rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] fix possible memleak in '__blk_trace_remove'
On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 11:35:59 +0800, Ye Bin wrote:
> From: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
>
> Diff v3 VS v2
> 1. Invert the check of 'blk_trace_{start,stop}' and return early from the
> function for the error case.
>
> Diff v2 VS v1:
> 1. Introduce 'blk_trace_{start,stop}' helper instead of 'blk_trace_switch_state'.
> 2. Move stop block trace from '__blk_trace_remove' to 'blk_trace_cleanup'.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/3] blktrace: introduce 'blk_trace_{start,stop}' helper
commit: 60a9bb9048f9e95029df10a9bc346f6b066c593c
[2/3] blktrace: fix possible memleak in '__blk_trace_remove'
commit: dcd1a59c62dc49da75539213611156d6db50ab5d
[3/3] blktrace: remove unnessary stop block trace in 'blk_trace_shutdown'
commit: 2db96217e7e515071726ca4ec791742c4202a1b2
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists