[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221020101549.06e3fa5b@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 10:15:49 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Song Chen <chensong_2000@....cn>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xiehuan09@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace/ring_buffer: remove unused arguments
On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:06:51 +0800
Song Chen <chensong_2000@....cn> wrote:
> As a argument, event has nothing to do with either
> ring_buffer_unlock_commit or rb_commit and cleaning
> it up has no side effect.
OK, so this is because of a389d86f7fd0 ("ring-buffer: Have nested events
still record running time stamp") which removed the usage of event in rb_commit():
static void rb_commit(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
struct ring_buffer_event *event)
{
local_inc(&cpu_buffer->entries);
- rb_update_write_stamp(cpu_buffer, event);
rb_end_commit(cpu_buffer);
}
I guess this doesn't hurt.
-- Steve
>
> Signed-off-by: Song Chen <chensong_2000@....cn>
> ---
> include/linux/ring_buffer.h | 3 +--
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 12 +++++-------
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists