[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221020143329.3276-1-jszhang@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:33:29 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] riscv: fix race when vmap stack overflow
Currently, when detecting vmap stack overflow, riscv firstly switches
to the so called shadow stack, then use this shadow stack to call the
get_overflow_stack() to get the overflow stack. However, there's
a race here if two or more harts use the same shadow stack at the same
time.
To solve this race, we introduce spin_shadow_stack atomic var, which
will be swap between its own address and 0 in atomic way, when the
var is set, it means the shadow_stack is being used; when the var
is cleared, it means the shadow_stack isn't being used.
Fixes: 31da94c25aea ("riscv: add VMAP_STACK overflow detection")
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
Suggested-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
---
Since v1:
- use smp_store_release directly
- use unsigned int instead of atomic_t
arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 4 ++++
arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
index b9eda3fcbd6d..7b924b16792b 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
@@ -404,6 +404,10 @@ handle_syscall_trace_exit:
#ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
handle_kernel_stack_overflow:
+1: la sp, spin_shadow_stack
+ amoswap.w sp, sp, (sp)
+ bnez sp, 1b
+
la sp, shadow_stack
addi sp, sp, SHADOW_OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
index f3e96d60a2ff..f1f57c1241b6 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
@@ -221,11 +221,15 @@ asmlinkage unsigned long get_overflow_stack(void)
OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE;
}
+unsigned int spin_shadow_stack;
+
asmlinkage void handle_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long tsk_stk = (unsigned long)current->stack;
unsigned long ovf_stk = (unsigned long)this_cpu_ptr(overflow_stack);
+ smp_store_release(&spin_shadow_stack, 0);
+
console_verbose();
pr_emerg("Insufficient stack space to handle exception!\n");
--
2.37.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists