[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221020152643.21199-4-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:26:38 +0200
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
glen.valante@...aro.org, arie.vanderhoeven@...gate.com,
rory.c.chen@...gate.com, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
Gianmarco Lusvardi <glusvardi@...teo.net>,
Giulio Barabino <giuliobarabino99@...il.com>,
Emiliano Maccaferri <inbox@...lianomaccaferri.com>
Subject: [PATCH V4 3/8] block, bfq: move io_cq-persistent bfqq data into a dedicated struct
With a multi-actuator drive, a process may get associated with multiple
bfq_queues: one queue for each of the N actuators. So, the bfq_io_cq
data structure must be able to accommodate its per-queue persistent
information for N queues. Currently it stores this information for
just one queue, in several scalar fields.
This is a preparatory commit for moving to accommodating persistent
information for N queues. In particular, this commit packs all the
above scalar fields into a single data structure. Then there is now
only one fieldi, in bfq_io_cq, that stores all the above information. This
scalar field will then be turned into an array by a following commit.
Suggested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Gianmarco Lusvardi <glusvardi@...teo.net>
Signed-off-by: Giulio Barabino <giuliobarabino99@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Emiliano Maccaferri <inbox@...lianomaccaferri.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
block/bfq-iosched.h | 52 +++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 57de6a6a7f06..d2bd94ea2e95 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic,
*/
bic->bfqq[is_sync][actuator_idx] = bfqq;
- if (bfqq && bic->stable_merge_bfqq == bfqq) {
+ if (bfqq && bic->bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq == bfqq) {
/*
* Actually, these same instructions are executed also
* in bfq_setup_cooperator, in case of abort or actual
@@ -415,9 +415,9 @@ void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic,
* did so, we would nest even more complexity in this
* function.
*/
- bfq_put_stable_ref(bic->stable_merge_bfqq);
+ bfq_put_stable_ref(bic->bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq);
- bic->stable_merge_bfqq = NULL;
+ bic->bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq = NULL;
}
}
@@ -1177,35 +1177,36 @@ bfq_bfqq_resume_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_data *bfqd,
unsigned int old_wr_coeff = 1;
bool busy = bfq_already_existing && bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq);
- if (bic->saved_has_short_ttime)
+ if (bic->bfqq_data->saved_has_short_ttime)
bfq_mark_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq);
else
bfq_clear_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq);
- if (bic->saved_IO_bound)
+ if (bic->bfqq_data->saved_IO_bound)
bfq_mark_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq);
else
bfq_clear_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq);
- bfqq->last_serv_time_ns = bic->saved_last_serv_time_ns;
- bfqq->inject_limit = bic->saved_inject_limit;
- bfqq->decrease_time_jif = bic->saved_decrease_time_jif;
+ bfqq->last_serv_time_ns = bic->bfqq_data->saved_last_serv_time_ns;
+ bfqq->inject_limit = bic->bfqq_data->saved_inject_limit;
+ bfqq->decrease_time_jif = bic->bfqq_data->saved_decrease_time_jif;
- bfqq->entity.new_weight = bic->saved_weight;
- bfqq->ttime = bic->saved_ttime;
- bfqq->io_start_time = bic->saved_io_start_time;
- bfqq->tot_idle_time = bic->saved_tot_idle_time;
+ bfqq->entity.new_weight = bic->bfqq_data->saved_weight;
+ bfqq->ttime = bic->bfqq_data->saved_ttime;
+ bfqq->io_start_time = bic->bfqq_data->saved_io_start_time;
+ bfqq->tot_idle_time = bic->bfqq_data->saved_tot_idle_time;
/*
* Restore weight coefficient only if low_latency is on
*/
if (bfqd->low_latency) {
old_wr_coeff = bfqq->wr_coeff;
- bfqq->wr_coeff = bic->saved_wr_coeff;
+ bfqq->wr_coeff = bic->bfqq_data->saved_wr_coeff;
}
- bfqq->service_from_wr = bic->saved_service_from_wr;
- bfqq->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt = bic->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt;
- bfqq->last_wr_start_finish = bic->saved_last_wr_start_finish;
- bfqq->wr_cur_max_time = bic->saved_wr_cur_max_time;
+ bfqq->service_from_wr = bic->bfqq_data->saved_service_from_wr;
+ bfqq->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt =
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt;
+ bfqq->last_wr_start_finish = bic->bfqq_data->saved_last_wr_start_finish;
+ bfqq->wr_cur_max_time = bic->bfqq_data->saved_wr_cur_max_time;
if (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 && (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq) ||
time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq->last_wr_start_finish +
@@ -1878,7 +1879,7 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
wr_or_deserves_wr = bfqd->low_latency &&
(bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 ||
(bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq) &&
- (bfqq->bic || RQ_BIC(rq)->stably_merged) &&
+ (bfqq->bic || RQ_BIC(rq)->bfqq_data->stably_merged) &&
(*interactive || soft_rt)));
/*
@@ -2923,21 +2924,21 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
* stable merging) also if bic is associated with a
* sync queue, but this bfqq is async
*/
- if (bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq) && bic->stable_merge_bfqq &&
+ if (bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq) && bic->bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq &&
!bfq_bfqq_just_created(bfqq) &&
time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq->split_time +
msecs_to_jiffies(bfq_late_stable_merging)) &&
time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq->creation_time +
msecs_to_jiffies(bfq_late_stable_merging))) {
struct bfq_queue *stable_merge_bfqq =
- bic->stable_merge_bfqq;
+ bic->bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq;
int proc_ref = min(bfqq_process_refs(bfqq),
bfqq_process_refs(stable_merge_bfqq));
/* deschedule stable merge, because done or aborted here */
bfq_put_stable_ref(stable_merge_bfqq);
- bic->stable_merge_bfqq = NULL;
+ bic->bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq = NULL;
if (!idling_boosts_thr_without_issues(bfqd, bfqq) &&
proc_ref > 0) {
@@ -2946,10 +2947,10 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
bfq_setup_merge(bfqq, stable_merge_bfqq);
if (new_bfqq) {
- bic->stably_merged = true;
+ bic->bfqq_data->stably_merged = true;
if (new_bfqq->bic)
- new_bfqq->bic->stably_merged =
- true;
+ new_bfqq->bic->bfqq_data->stably_merged =
+ true;
}
return new_bfqq;
} else
@@ -3057,18 +3058,21 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_save_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
if (!bic)
return;
- bic->saved_last_serv_time_ns = bfqq->last_serv_time_ns;
- bic->saved_inject_limit = bfqq->inject_limit;
- bic->saved_decrease_time_jif = bfqq->decrease_time_jif;
-
- bic->saved_weight = bfqq->entity.orig_weight;
- bic->saved_ttime = bfqq->ttime;
- bic->saved_has_short_ttime = bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq);
- bic->saved_IO_bound = bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq);
- bic->saved_io_start_time = bfqq->io_start_time;
- bic->saved_tot_idle_time = bfqq->tot_idle_time;
- bic->saved_in_large_burst = bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq);
- bic->was_in_burst_list = !hlist_unhashed(&bfqq->burst_list_node);
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_last_serv_time_ns = bfqq->last_serv_time_ns;
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_inject_limit = bfqq->inject_limit;
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_decrease_time_jif = bfqq->decrease_time_jif;
+
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_weight = bfqq->entity.orig_weight;
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_ttime = bfqq->ttime;
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_has_short_ttime =
+ bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq);
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_IO_bound = bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq);
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_io_start_time = bfqq->io_start_time;
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_tot_idle_time = bfqq->tot_idle_time;
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_in_large_burst = bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq);
+ bic->bfqq_data->was_in_burst_list =
+ !hlist_unhashed(&bfqq->burst_list_node);
+
if (unlikely(bfq_bfqq_just_created(bfqq) &&
!bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq) &&
bfqq->bfqd->low_latency)) {
@@ -3081,17 +3085,21 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_save_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
* to bfqq, so that to avoid that bfqq unjustly fails
* to enjoy weight raising if split soon.
*/
- bic->saved_wr_coeff = bfqq->bfqd->bfq_wr_coeff;
- bic->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt = bfq_smallest_from_now();
- bic->saved_wr_cur_max_time = bfq_wr_duration(bfqq->bfqd);
- bic->saved_last_wr_start_finish = jiffies;
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_wr_coeff = bfqq->bfqd->bfq_wr_coeff;
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt =
+ bfq_smallest_from_now();
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_wr_cur_max_time =
+ bfq_wr_duration(bfqq->bfqd);
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_last_wr_start_finish = jiffies;
} else {
- bic->saved_wr_coeff = bfqq->wr_coeff;
- bic->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt =
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_wr_coeff = bfqq->wr_coeff;
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt =
bfqq->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt;
- bic->saved_service_from_wr = bfqq->service_from_wr;
- bic->saved_last_wr_start_finish = bfqq->last_wr_start_finish;
- bic->saved_wr_cur_max_time = bfqq->wr_cur_max_time;
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_service_from_wr =
+ bfqq->service_from_wr;
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_last_wr_start_finish =
+ bfqq->last_wr_start_finish;
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_wr_cur_max_time = bfqq->wr_cur_max_time;
}
}
@@ -5421,8 +5429,8 @@ static void bfq_exit_icq(struct io_cq *icq)
spin_lock_irqsave(&bfqd->lock, flags);
for (act_idx = 0; act_idx < bfqd->num_actuators; act_idx++) {
- if (bic->stable_merge_bfqq)
- bfq_put_stable_ref(bic->stable_merge_bfqq);
+ if (bic->bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq)
+ bfq_put_stable_ref(bic->bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq);
bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(bic, true, act_idx);
bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(bic, false, act_idx);
@@ -5617,8 +5625,8 @@ bfq_do_early_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
return bfqq;
if (new_bfqq->bic)
- new_bfqq->bic->stably_merged = true;
- bic->stably_merged = true;
+ new_bfqq->bic->bfqq_data->stably_merged = true;
+ bic->bfqq_data->stably_merged = true;
/*
* Reusing merge functions. This implies that
@@ -5748,7 +5756,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_do_or_sched_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
/*
* Record the bfqq to merge to.
*/
- bic->stable_merge_bfqq = last_bfqq_created;
+ bic->bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq = last_bfqq_created;
}
}
@@ -6682,12 +6690,12 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
bic_set_bfqq(bic, bfqq, is_sync, act_idx);
if (split && is_sync) {
- if ((bic->was_in_burst_list && bfqd->large_burst) ||
- bic->saved_in_large_burst)
+ if ((bic->bfqq_data->was_in_burst_list && bfqd->large_burst) ||
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_in_large_burst)
bfq_mark_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq);
else {
bfq_clear_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq);
- if (bic->was_in_burst_list)
+ if (bic->bfqq_data->was_in_burst_list)
/*
* If bfqq was in the current
* burst list before being
@@ -6802,12 +6810,12 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq)
if (likely(!new_queue)) {
/* If the queue was seeky for too long, break it apart. */
if (bfq_bfqq_coop(bfqq) && bfq_bfqq_split_coop(bfqq) &&
- !bic->stably_merged) {
+ !bic->bfqq_data->stably_merged) {
struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bfqq;
/* Update bic before losing reference to bfqq */
if (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq))
- bic->saved_in_large_burst = true;
+ bic->bfqq_data->saved_in_large_burst = true;
bfqq = bfq_split_bfqq(bic, bfqq);
split = true;
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h
index d98e31be447f..6bc7bed97956 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.h
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h
@@ -415,27 +415,9 @@ struct bfq_queue {
};
/**
- * struct bfq_io_cq - per (request_queue, io_context) structure.
- */
-struct bfq_io_cq {
- /* associated io_cq structure */
- struct io_cq icq; /* must be the first member */
- /*
- * Matrix of associated process queues: first row for async
- * queues, second row sync queues. Each row contains one
- * column for each actuator. An I/O request generated by the
- * process is inserted into the queue pointed by bfqq[i][j] if
- * the request is to be served by the j-th actuator of the
- * drive, where i==0 or i==1, depending on whether the request
- * is async or sync. So there is a distinct queue for each
- * actuator.
- */
- struct bfq_queue *bfqq[2][BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS];
- /* per (request_queue, blkcg) ioprio */
- int ioprio;
-#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
- uint64_t blkcg_serial_nr; /* the current blkcg serial */
-#endif
+* struct bfq_data - bfqq data unique and persistent for associated bfq_io_cq
+*/
+struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data {
/*
* Snapshot of the has_short_time flag before merging; taken
* to remember its value while the queue is merged, so as to
@@ -490,6 +472,34 @@ struct bfq_io_cq {
struct bfq_queue *stable_merge_bfqq;
bool stably_merged; /* non splittable if true */
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct bfq_io_cq - per (request_queue, io_context) structure.
+ */
+struct bfq_io_cq {
+ /* associated io_cq structure */
+ struct io_cq icq; /* must be the first member */
+ /*
+ * Matrix of associated process queues: first row for async
+ * queues, second row sync queues. Each row contains one
+ * column for each actuator. An I/O request generated by the
+ * process is inserted into the queue pointed by bfqq[i][j] if
+ * the request is to be served by the j-th actuator of the
+ * drive, where i==0 or i==1, depending on whether the request
+ * is async or sync. So there is a distinct queue for each
+ * actuator.
+ */
+ struct bfq_queue *bfqq[2][BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS];
+ /* per (request_queue, blkcg) ioprio */
+ int ioprio;
+#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
+ uint64_t blkcg_serial_nr; /* the current blkcg serial */
+#endif
+
+ /* persistent data for associated synchronous process queue */
+ struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data;
+
unsigned int requests; /* Number of requests this process has in flight */
};
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists