[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202210220638.gSsTFh3O-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 06:53:04 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab: Annotate kmem_cache_node->list_lock as raw
Hi Jiri,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jiri-Kosina/mm-slab-Annotate-kmem_cache_node-list_lock-as-raw/20221021-225037
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/nycvar.YFH.7.76.2210211643330.29912%40cbobk.fhfr.pm
patch subject: [PATCH] mm/slab: Annotate kmem_cache_node->list_lock as raw
config: riscv-randconfig-r023-20221019
compiler: clang version 16.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 791a7ae1ba3efd6bca96338e10ffde557ba83920)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install riscv cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/709b8ca6934319e9e8e0519baa3ac2bb4f634451
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Jiri-Kosina/mm-slab-Annotate-kmem_cache_node-list_lock-as-raw/20221021-225037
git checkout 709b8ca6934319e9e8e0519baa3ac2bb4f634451
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=riscv SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:136:
include/asm-generic/io.h:751:2: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
insw(addr, buffer, count);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:105:53: note: expanded from macro 'insw'
#define insw(addr, buffer, count) __insw(PCI_IOBASE + (addr), buffer, count)
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
In file included from mm/slub.c:14:
In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:136:
include/asm-generic/io.h:759:2: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
insl(addr, buffer, count);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:106:53: note: expanded from macro 'insl'
#define insl(addr, buffer, count) __insl(PCI_IOBASE + (addr), buffer, count)
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
In file included from mm/slub.c:14:
In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:136:
include/asm-generic/io.h:768:2: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
outsb(addr, buffer, count);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:118:55: note: expanded from macro 'outsb'
#define outsb(addr, buffer, count) __outsb(PCI_IOBASE + (addr), buffer, count)
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
In file included from mm/slub.c:14:
In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:136:
include/asm-generic/io.h:777:2: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
outsw(addr, buffer, count);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:119:55: note: expanded from macro 'outsw'
#define outsw(addr, buffer, count) __outsw(PCI_IOBASE + (addr), buffer, count)
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
In file included from mm/slub.c:14:
In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:136:
include/asm-generic/io.h:786:2: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
outsl(addr, buffer, count);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:120:55: note: expanded from macro 'outsl'
#define outsl(addr, buffer, count) __outsl(PCI_IOBASE + (addr), buffer, count)
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
In file included from mm/slub.c:14:
In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:136:
include/asm-generic/io.h:1134:55: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
return (port > MMIO_UPPER_LIMIT) ? NULL : PCI_IOBASE + port;
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> mm/slub.c:2124:20: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:380:39: note: expanded from macro 'spin_lock_irqsave'
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(spinlock_check(lock), flags); \
^~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:243:34: note: expanded from macro 'raw_spin_lock_irqsave'
flags = _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock); \
^~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:323:67: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *spinlock_check(spinlock_t *lock)
^
mm/slub.c:2132:25: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:403:64: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
static __always_inline void spin_unlock_irqrestore(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
^
mm/slub.c:2210:20: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:380:39: note: expanded from macro 'spin_lock_irqsave'
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(spinlock_check(lock), flags); \
^~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:243:34: note: expanded from macro 'raw_spin_lock_irqsave'
flags = _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock); \
^~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:323:67: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *spinlock_check(spinlock_t *lock)
^
mm/slub.c:2247:25: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:403:64: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
static __always_inline void spin_unlock_irqrestore(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
^
mm/slub.c:2199:15: warning: variable 'partial_slabs' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
unsigned int partial_slabs = 0;
^
mm/slub.c:2489:21: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:380:39: note: expanded from macro 'spin_lock_irqsave'
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(spinlock_check(lock), flags); \
^~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:243:34: note: expanded from macro 'raw_spin_lock_irqsave'
flags = _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock); \
^~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:323:67: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *spinlock_check(spinlock_t *lock)
^
mm/slub.c:2497:21: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:380:39: note: expanded from macro 'spin_lock_irqsave'
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(spinlock_check(lock), flags); \
^~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:243:34: note: expanded from macro 'raw_spin_lock_irqsave'
flags = _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock); \
^~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:323:67: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *spinlock_check(spinlock_t *lock)
^
mm/slub.c:2508:27: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:403:64: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
static __always_inline void spin_unlock_irqrestore(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
^
mm/slub.c:2515:26: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:403:64: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
static __always_inline void spin_unlock_irqrestore(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
^
mm/slub.c:2523:26: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:403:64: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
static __always_inline void spin_unlock_irqrestore(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
^
mm/slub.c:2847:20: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:380:39: note: expanded from macro 'spin_lock_irqsave'
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(spinlock_check(lock), flags); \
^~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:243:34: note: expanded from macro 'raw_spin_lock_irqsave'
flags = _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock); \
^~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:323:67: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *spinlock_check(spinlock_t *lock)
^
mm/slub.c:2926:25: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:403:64: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
static __always_inline void spin_unlock_irqrestore(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
^
mm/slub.c:2946:20: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
vim +2124 mm/slub.c
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2097
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2098 /*
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2099 * Called only for kmem_cache_debug() caches to allocate from a freshly
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2100 * allocated slab. Allocate a single object instead of whole freelist
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2101 * and put the slab to the partial (or full) list.
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2102 */
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2103 static void *alloc_single_from_new_slab(struct kmem_cache *s,
6edf2576a6cc46 Feng Tang 2022-09-13 2104 struct slab *slab, int orig_size)
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2105 {
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2106 int nid = slab_nid(slab);
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2107 struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, nid);
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2108 unsigned long flags;
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2109 void *object;
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2110
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2111
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2112 object = slab->freelist;
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2113 slab->freelist = get_freepointer(s, object);
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2114 slab->inuse = 1;
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2115
6edf2576a6cc46 Feng Tang 2022-09-13 2116 if (!alloc_debug_processing(s, slab, object, orig_size))
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2117 /*
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2118 * It's not really expected that this would fail on a
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2119 * freshly allocated slab, but a concurrent memory
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2120 * corruption in theory could cause that.
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2121 */
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2122 return NULL;
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2123
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 @2124 spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2125
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2126 if (slab->inuse == slab->objects)
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2127 add_full(s, n, slab);
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2128 else
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2129 add_partial(n, slab, DEACTIVATE_TO_HEAD);
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2130
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2131 inc_slabs_node(s, nid, slab->objects);
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2132 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2133
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2134 return object;
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2135 }
c7323a5ad07863 Vlastimil Babka 2022-08-23 2136
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
View attachment "config" of type "text/plain" (125180 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists