[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1Htmxkt6+MDAq1i@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:53:47 -0700
From: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] selftest/seccomp: add a new test for the sync mode
of seccomp_user_notify
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 10:04:44PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On October 19, 2022 6:10:48 PM PDT, Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com> wrote:
> >Test output:
> >RUN global.user_notification_sync ...
> >seccomp_bpf.c:4279:user_notification_sync:basic: 8655 nsec/syscall
> >seccomp_bpf.c:4279:user_notification_sync:sync: 2919 nsec/syscall
> >OK global.user_notification_sync
>
> This looks like a benchmark, not a functionality test. But maybe the test is "is sync faster than async?"
>
Yes, it is. I found it quite useful for debugging and understanding that
everything works as expected. I like the idea to check that sync is
faster than async. I will add it and address all your other comments in
the next version. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists