linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] cxl: Unify debug messages when calling devm_cxl_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y1Je5L67RAfTohQm@rric.localdomain>
Date:   Fri, 21 Oct 2022 10:57:08 +0200
From:   Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC:     Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@...nel.org>,
        <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] cxl: Unify debug messages when calling
 devm_cxl_add_port()

On 20.10.22 17:20:10, Dan Williams wrote:
> Robert Richter wrote:
> > CXL ports are added in a couple of code paths using devm_cxl_add_
> > port(). Debug messages are individually generated, but are incomplete
> 
> Hmm, devm_cxl_add_port() got wrapped in a few places here. I fixed it up
> locally, but maybe take a look at your word wrap to keep function
> symbols unbroken in future changelogs.

Ok, will do. Thanks for the note.

> 
> > and inconsistent. Change this by moving its generation to devm_cxl_
> > add_port(). This unifies the messages and reduces code duplication.
> > Also, generate messages on failure. Use a __devm_cxl_add_port()
> > wrapper to keep the readability of the error exits.
> 
> Otherwise looks good, applied for v6.2.

Thanks,

-Robert