linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 0/9] dyndbg: drm.debug adaptation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a65pfsbq.fsf@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Oct 2022 12:18:17 +0300
From:   Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        jbaron@...mai.com, seanpaul@...omium.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, joe@...ches.com,
        intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 0/9] dyndbg: drm.debug adaptation

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 03:02:34PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 11:28:43PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
>> > hi Greg, Dan, Jason, DRM-folk,
>> > 
>> > heres follow-up to V6:
>> >   rebased on driver-core/driver-core-next for -v6 applied bits (thanks)
>> >   rework drm_debug_enabled{_raw,_instrumented,} per Dan.
>> > 
>> > It excludes:
>> >   nouveau parts (immature)
>> >   tracefs parts (I missed --to=Steve on v6)
>> >   split _ddebug_site and de-duplicate experiment (way unready)
>> > 
>> > IOW, its the remaining commits of V6 on which Dan gave his Reviewed-by.
>> > 
>> > If these are good to apply, I'll rebase and repost the rest separately.
>> 
>> All now queued up, thanks.
>
> This stuff broke i915 debugs. When I first load i915 no debug prints are
> produced. If I then go fiddle around in /sys/module/drm/parameters/debug
> the debug prints start to suddenly work.

Wait what? I always assumed the default behaviour would stay the same,
which is usually how we roll. It's a regression in my books. We've got a
CI farm that's not very helpful in terms of dmesg logging right now
because of this.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center