[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1J3QwynPFIlfrIv@loth.rohan.me.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:41:07 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Tomas Marek <tomas.marek@...est.cz>
Cc: mpm@...enic.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, oleg.karfich@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwrng: stm32 - fix number of returned bytes on read
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 06:09:23PM +0200, Tomas Marek wrote:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c
> index bc22178f83e8..8eaacefd498b 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c
> @@ -49,11 +49,13 @@ static int stm32_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *data, size_t max, bool wait)
> /* Manage timeout which is based on timer and take */
> /* care of initial delay time when enabling rng */
> if (!sr && wait) {
> - retval = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(priv->base
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(priv->base
This would make a lot more sense if you called it err instead of ret.
But as you're fixing a real bug I'm going to apply your patch as is
and you can post an incremental patch to improve it.
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists