lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1PUBoPJx2m2BMRR@kroah.com>
Date:   Sat, 22 Oct 2022 13:29:10 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.19 000/717] 5.19.17-rc1 review

On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 01:15:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.17 release.
> > > > There are 717 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Note, this will be the LAST 5.19.y kernel to be released.  Please move
> > > > to the 6.0.y kernel branch at this point in time, as after this is
> > > > released, this branch will be end-of-life.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi Greg, thanks for the patch series, which is out three days after
> > > the -rc1 have been pused. As usual, the template message follows.
> > 
> > What exactly do you mean by "3 days after"?
> > 
> > Are you watching the linux-stable-rc branches?  Those are there only for
> > CI systems and are not a "real" -rc release at all until we do this
> > email announcement.
> > 
> > The -rc1 release here does not look at all like what was in the
> > linux-stable-rc branch 3 days ago if you look closely.  There are a lot
> > fewer patches now than before, and other changes.
> > 
> > So again, unless you are running a CI system, don't look at the
> > linux-stable-rc branches.
> 
> What do you suggest for people trying to review -stable? Two days are
> not enough to review 500 patches...

There's 717 patches here, more than 500 :)

Almost all of these have been in the stable queue for a full week now,
if not longer.  Almost all of these were already in the last 6.0.y
review cycle and release also, so you all should have already seen these
before, and maintainers have had a chance to weigh in on them.

Kernel development is constantly going faster this year than last year,
that's something that has always been the case, so having more patches
in stable is also a constant.

Also, there's no requirement that you have to review them all, right?
Review the ones that you care about in your subsystems and all is good.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ