[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221022114424.906110403@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 13:14:10 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: x86@...nel.org, willy@...radead.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, aarcange@...hat.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, jroedel@...e.de, ubizjak@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH 07/13] mm/gup: Fix the lockless PMD access
On architectures where the PTE/PMD is larger than the native word size
(i386-PAE for example), READ_ONCE() can do the wrong thing. Use
pmdp_get_lockless() just like we use ptep_get_lockless().
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 2 +-
mm/gup.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -7186,7 +7186,7 @@ static u64 perf_get_pgtable_size(struct
return pud_leaf_size(pud);
pmdp = pmd_offset_lockless(pudp, pud, addr);
- pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
+ pmd = pmdp_get_lockless(pmdp);
if (!pmd_present(pmd))
return 0;
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -2507,7 +2507,7 @@ static int gup_pmd_range(pud_t *pudp, pu
pmdp = pmd_offset_lockless(pudp, pud, addr);
do {
- pmd_t pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
+ pmd_t pmd = pmdp_get_lockless(pmdp);
next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
if (!pmd_present(pmd))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists