linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.19 180/717] thermal: cpufreq_cooling: Check the policy first in cpufreq_cooling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 22 Oct 2022 09:20:59 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@...soc.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 180/717] thermal: cpufreq_cooling: Check the policy first in cpufreq_cooling_register()

From: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@...soc.com>

[ Upstream commit cff895277c8558221ba180aefe26799dcb4eec86 ]

Since the policy needs to be accessed first when obtaining cpu devices,
first check whether the policy is legal before this.

Fixes: 5130802ddbb1 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: Switch to QoS requests for freq limits")
Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@...soc.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c
index dc19e7c80751..ca5746f53d9e 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c
@@ -530,17 +530,17 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np,
 	struct thermal_cooling_device_ops *cooling_ops;
 	char *name;
 
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(policy)) {
+		pr_err("%s: cpufreq policy isn't valid: %p\n", __func__, policy);
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	}
+
 	dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
 	if (unlikely(!dev)) {
 		pr_warn("No cpu device for cpu %d\n", policy->cpu);
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
 	}
 
-	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(policy)) {
-		pr_err("%s: cpufreq policy isn't valid: %p\n", __func__, policy);
-		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-	}
-
 	i = cpufreq_table_count_valid_entries(policy);
 	if (!i) {
 		pr_debug("%s: CPUFreq table not found or has no valid entries\n",
-- 
2.35.1