| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20221022072502.557784933@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 09:22:31 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 272/717] xfrm: Reinject transport-mode packets through workqueue
From: Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>
[ Upstream commit 4f4920669d21e1060b7243e5118dc3b71ced1276 ]
The following warning is displayed when the tcp6-multi-diffip11 stress
test case of the LTP test suite is tested:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [ns-tcpserver:48198]
CPU: 0 PID: 48198 Comm: ns-tcpserver Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.0.0-rc6+ #39
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : des3_ede_encrypt+0x27c/0x460 [libdes]
lr : 0x3f
sp : ffff80000ceaa1b0
x29: ffff80000ceaa1b0 x28: ffff0000df056100 x27: ffff0000e51e5280
x26: ffff80004df75030 x25: ffff0000e51e4600 x24: 000000000000003b
x23: 0000000000802080 x22: 000000000000003d x21: 0000000000000038
x20: 0000000080000020 x19: 000000000000000a x18: 0000000000000033
x17: ffff0000e51e4780 x16: ffff80004e2d1448 x15: ffff80004e2d1248
x14: ffff0000e51e4680 x13: ffff80004e2d1348 x12: ffff80004e2d1548
x11: ffff80004e2d1848 x10: ffff80004e2d1648 x9 : ffff80004e2d1748
x8 : ffff80004e2d1948 x7 : 000000000bcaf83d x6 : 000000000000001b
x5 : ffff80004e2d1048 x4 : 00000000761bf3bf x3 : 000000007f1dd0a3
x2 : ffff0000e51e4780 x1 : ffff0000e3b9a2f8 x0 : 00000000db44e872
Call trace:
des3_ede_encrypt+0x27c/0x460 [libdes]
crypto_des3_ede_encrypt+0x1c/0x30 [des_generic]
crypto_cbc_encrypt+0x148/0x190
crypto_skcipher_encrypt+0x2c/0x40
crypto_authenc_encrypt+0xc8/0xfc [authenc]
crypto_aead_encrypt+0x2c/0x40
echainiv_encrypt+0x144/0x1a0 [echainiv]
crypto_aead_encrypt+0x2c/0x40
esp6_output_tail+0x1c8/0x5d0 [esp6]
esp6_output+0x120/0x278 [esp6]
xfrm_output_one+0x458/0x4ec
xfrm_output_resume+0x6c/0x1f0
xfrm_output+0xac/0x4ac
__xfrm6_output+0x130/0x270
xfrm6_output+0x60/0xec
ip6_xmit+0x2ec/0x5bc
inet6_csk_xmit+0xbc/0x10c
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x460/0x8c0
tcp_write_xmit+0x348/0x890
__tcp_push_pending_frames+0x44/0x110
tcp_rcv_established+0x3c8/0x720
tcp_v6_do_rcv+0xdc/0x4a0
tcp_v6_rcv+0xc24/0xcb0
ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0xf0/0x574
ip6_input_finish+0x48/0x7c
ip6_input+0x48/0xc0
ip6_rcv_finish+0x80/0x9c
xfrm_trans_reinject+0xb0/0xf4
tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0xf8/0x134
tasklet_action+0x30/0x3c
__do_softirq+0x128/0x368
do_softirq+0xb4/0xc0
__local_bh_enable_ip+0xb0/0xb4
put_cpu_fpsimd_context+0x40/0x70
kernel_neon_end+0x20/0x40
sha1_base_do_update.constprop.0.isra.0+0x11c/0x140 [sha1_ce]
sha1_ce_finup+0x94/0x110 [sha1_ce]
crypto_shash_finup+0x34/0xc0
hmac_finup+0x48/0xe0
crypto_shash_finup+0x34/0xc0
shash_digest_unaligned+0x74/0x90
crypto_shash_digest+0x4c/0x9c
shash_ahash_digest+0xc8/0xf0
shash_async_digest+0x28/0x34
crypto_ahash_digest+0x48/0xcc
crypto_authenc_genicv+0x88/0xcc [authenc]
crypto_authenc_encrypt+0xd8/0xfc [authenc]
crypto_aead_encrypt+0x2c/0x40
echainiv_encrypt+0x144/0x1a0 [echainiv]
crypto_aead_encrypt+0x2c/0x40
esp6_output_tail+0x1c8/0x5d0 [esp6]
esp6_output+0x120/0x278 [esp6]
xfrm_output_one+0x458/0x4ec
xfrm_output_resume+0x6c/0x1f0
xfrm_output+0xac/0x4ac
__xfrm6_output+0x130/0x270
xfrm6_output+0x60/0xec
ip6_xmit+0x2ec/0x5bc
inet6_csk_xmit+0xbc/0x10c
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x460/0x8c0
tcp_write_xmit+0x348/0x890
__tcp_push_pending_frames+0x44/0x110
tcp_push+0xb4/0x14c
tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x71c/0xb64
tcp_sendmsg+0x40/0x6c
inet6_sendmsg+0x4c/0x80
sock_sendmsg+0x5c/0x6c
__sys_sendto+0x128/0x15c
__arm64_sys_sendto+0x30/0x40
invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x170/0x194
do_el0_svc+0x38/0x4c
el0_svc+0x28/0xe0
el0t_64_sync_handler+0xbc/0x13c
el0t_64_sync+0x180/0x184
Get softirq info by bcc tool:
./softirqs -NT 10
Tracing soft irq event time... Hit Ctrl-C to end.
15:34:34
SOFTIRQ TOTAL_nsecs
block 158990
timer 20030920
sched 46577080
net_rx 676746820
tasklet 9906067650
15:34:45
SOFTIRQ TOTAL_nsecs
block 86100
sched 38849790
net_rx 676532470
timer 1163848790
tasklet 9409019620
15:34:55
SOFTIRQ TOTAL_nsecs
sched 58078450
net_rx 475156720
timer 533832410
tasklet 9431333300
The tasklet software interrupt takes too much time. Therefore, the
xfrm_trans_reinject executor is changed from tasklet to workqueue. Add add
spin lock to protect the queue. This reduces the processing flow of the
tcp_sendmsg function in this scenario.
Fixes: acf568ee859f0 ("xfrm: Reinject transport-mode packets through tasklet")
Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
index b2f4ec9c537f..aa5220565763 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
@@ -24,7 +24,8 @@
#include "xfrm_inout.h"
struct xfrm_trans_tasklet {
- struct tasklet_struct tasklet;
+ struct work_struct work;
+ spinlock_t queue_lock;
struct sk_buff_head queue;
};
@@ -760,18 +761,22 @@ int xfrm_input_resume(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_input_resume);
-static void xfrm_trans_reinject(struct tasklet_struct *t)
+static void xfrm_trans_reinject(struct work_struct *work)
{
- struct xfrm_trans_tasklet *trans = from_tasklet(trans, t, tasklet);
+ struct xfrm_trans_tasklet *trans = container_of(work, struct xfrm_trans_tasklet, work);
struct sk_buff_head queue;
struct sk_buff *skb;
__skb_queue_head_init(&queue);
+ spin_lock_bh(&trans->queue_lock);
skb_queue_splice_init(&trans->queue, &queue);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&trans->queue_lock);
+ local_bh_disable();
while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&queue)))
XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->finish(XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->net,
NULL, skb);
+ local_bh_enable();
}
int xfrm_trans_queue_net(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
@@ -789,8 +794,10 @@ int xfrm_trans_queue_net(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->finish = finish;
XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->net = net;
+ spin_lock_bh(&trans->queue_lock);
__skb_queue_tail(&trans->queue, skb);
- tasklet_schedule(&trans->tasklet);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&trans->queue_lock);
+ schedule_work(&trans->work);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_trans_queue_net);
@@ -817,7 +824,8 @@ void __init xfrm_input_init(void)
struct xfrm_trans_tasklet *trans;
trans = &per_cpu(xfrm_trans_tasklet, i);
+ spin_lock_init(&trans->queue_lock);
__skb_queue_head_init(&trans->queue);
- tasklet_setup(&trans->tasklet, xfrm_trans_reinject);
+ INIT_WORK(&trans->work, xfrm_trans_reinject);
}
}
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists