linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.19 286/717] af_unix: Fix memory leaks of the whole sk due to OOB skb.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221022072504.218304416@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sat, 22 Oct 2022 09:22:45 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
        Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 286/717] af_unix: Fix memory leaks of the whole sk due to OOB skb.

From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>

[ Upstream commit 7a62ed61367b8fd01bae1e18e30602c25060d824 ]

syzbot reported a sequence of memory leaks, and one of them indicated we
failed to free a whole sk:

  unreferenced object 0xffff8880126e0000 (size 1088):
    comm "syz-executor419", pid 326, jiffies 4294773607 (age 12.609s)
    hex dump (first 32 bytes):
      00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 7d 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ........}.......
      01 00 07 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ...@............
    backtrace:
      [<000000006fefe750>] sk_prot_alloc+0x64/0x2a0 net/core/sock.c:1970
      [<0000000074006db5>] sk_alloc+0x3b/0x800 net/core/sock.c:2029
      [<00000000728cd434>] unix_create1+0xaf/0x920 net/unix/af_unix.c:928
      [<00000000a279a139>] unix_create+0x113/0x1d0 net/unix/af_unix.c:997
      [<0000000068259812>] __sock_create+0x2ab/0x550 net/socket.c:1516
      [<00000000da1521e1>] sock_create net/socket.c:1566 [inline]
      [<00000000da1521e1>] __sys_socketpair+0x1a8/0x550 net/socket.c:1698
      [<000000007ab259e1>] __do_sys_socketpair net/socket.c:1751 [inline]
      [<000000007ab259e1>] __se_sys_socketpair net/socket.c:1748 [inline]
      [<000000007ab259e1>] __x64_sys_socketpair+0x97/0x100 net/socket.c:1748
      [<000000007dedddc1>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
      [<000000007dedddc1>] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
      [<000000009456679f>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

We can reproduce this issue by creating two AF_UNIX SOCK_STREAM sockets,
send()ing an OOB skb to each other, and close()ing them without consuming
the OOB skbs.

  int skpair[2];

  socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, skpair);

  send(skpair[0], "x", 1, MSG_OOB);
  send(skpair[1], "x", 1, MSG_OOB);

  close(skpair[0]);
  close(skpair[1]);

Currently, we free an OOB skb in unix_sock_destructor() which is called via
__sk_free(), but it's too late because the receiver's unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb
is accounted against the sender's sk->sk_wmem_alloc and __sk_free() is
called only when sk->sk_wmem_alloc is 0.

In the repro sequences, we do not consume the OOB skb, so both two sk's
sock_put() never reach __sk_free() due to the positive sk->sk_wmem_alloc.
Then, no one can consume the OOB skb nor call __sk_free(), and we finally
leak the two whole sk.

Thus, we must free the unconsumed OOB skb earlier when close()ing the
socket.

Fixes: 314001f0bf92 ("af_unix: Add OOB support")
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/unix/af_unix.c |   13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -548,12 +548,6 @@ static void unix_sock_destructor(struct
 
 	skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
 
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AF_UNIX_OOB)
-	if (u->oob_skb) {
-		kfree_skb(u->oob_skb);
-		u->oob_skb = NULL;
-	}
-#endif
 	WARN_ON(refcount_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc));
 	WARN_ON(!sk_unhashed(sk));
 	WARN_ON(sk->sk_socket);
@@ -598,6 +592,13 @@ static void unix_release_sock(struct soc
 
 	unix_state_unlock(sk);
 
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AF_UNIX_OOB)
+	if (u->oob_skb) {
+		kfree_skb(u->oob_skb);
+		u->oob_skb = NULL;
+	}
+#endif
+
 	wake_up_interruptible_all(&u->peer_wait);
 
 	if (skpair != NULL) {