linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 0/3]] Add TDX Guest Attestation support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 23 Oct 2022 09:09:39 -0700
From:   Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
        Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>,
        Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
        marcelo.cerri@...onical.com, tim.gardner@...onical.com,
        khalid.elmously@...onical.com, philip.cox@...onical.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 0/3]] Add TDX Guest Attestation support

Hi Dave,

On 10/20/22 10:08 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 10/19/22 21:58, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>> Following are the details of the patch set:
>>
>> Patch 1/3 -> Preparatory patch for adding attestation support.
>> Patch 2/3 -> Adds user interface driver to support attestation.
>> Patch 3/3 -> Adds selftest support for TDREPORT feature.
>>
>> Commit log history is maintained in the individual patches.
> 
> I really appreciate when folks come out and say what they think should
> be done with the series.  Is this ready to be applied?  Or, is it just

There are some minor changes suggested by Greg in this version. I will
address them in the next version. IMO, the next version can be considered
for the merge.

> being thrown over the fence in the general direction of the maintainers
> with the hope that they'll divine its true purpose?

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer