linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] drm: Switch drm_client_buffer_delete() to unlocked drm_gem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 23 Oct 2022 20:01:27 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To:     Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm: Switch drm_client_buffer_delete() to unlocked
 drm_gem_vunmap

Hello,

On 10/21/22 00:33, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> The drm_client_buffer_delete() wasn't switched to unlocked GEM vunmapping
> by accident when rest of drm_client code transitioned to the unlocked
> variants of the vmapping functions. Make drm_client_buffer_delete() use
> the unlocked variant. This fixes lockdep warning splat about missing
> reservation lock when framebuffer is released.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@...el.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/890f70db-68b0-8456-ca3c-c5496ef90517@collabora.com/T/
> Fixes: 79e2cf2e7a19 ("drm/gem: Take reservation lock for vmap/vunmap operations")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c
> index fbcb1e995384..38e1be991caa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c
> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static void drm_client_buffer_delete(struct drm_client_buffer *buffer)
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = buffer->client->dev;
>  
> -	drm_gem_vunmap(buffer->gem, &buffer->map);
> +	drm_gem_vunmap_unlocked(buffer->gem, &buffer->map);
>  
>  	if (buffer->gem)
>  		drm_gem_object_put(buffer->gem);

Christian, could you please give yours r-b? The dim insists that the
patch should have r-b or it won't let me push to misc-next. Thanks in
advance!

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry