[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221024113025.760158677@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 13:27:51 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 074/390] ring-buffer: Have the shortest_full queue be the shortest not longest
From: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
commit 3b19d614b61b93a131f463817e08219c9ce1fee3 upstream.
The logic to know when the shortest waiters on the ring buffer should be
woken up or not has uses a less than instead of a greater than compare,
which causes the shortest_full to actually be the longest.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220927231823.718039222@goodmis.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Fixes: 2c2b0a78b3739 ("ring-buffer: Add percentage of ring buffer full to wake up reader")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ int ring_buffer_wait(struct trace_buffer
nr_pages = cpu_buffer->nr_pages;
dirty = ring_buffer_nr_dirty_pages(buffer, cpu);
if (!cpu_buffer->shortest_full ||
- cpu_buffer->shortest_full < full)
+ cpu_buffer->shortest_full > full)
cpu_buffer->shortest_full = full;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
if (!pagebusy &&
Powered by blists - more mailing lists