[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa3f35c1-1550-a322-956f-1837cb2389a9@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:55:13 +0800
From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
To: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@...il.com>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: 18801353760@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 3/5] ceph: fix possible null-ptr-deref when parsing
param
On 24/10/2022 00:39, Hawkins Jiawei wrote:
> According to commit "vfs: parse: deal with zero length string value",
> kernel will set the param->string to null pointer in vfs_parse_fs_string()
> if fs string has zero length.
>
> Yet the problem is that, ceph_parse_mount_param() will dereferences the
> param->string, without checking whether it is a null pointer, which may
> trigger a null-ptr-deref bug.
>
> This patch solves it by adding sanity check on param->string
> in ceph_parse_mount_param().
>
> Signed-off-by: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/ceph/super.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/super.c b/fs/ceph/super.c
> index 3fc48b43cab0..341e23fe29eb 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/super.c
> @@ -417,6 +417,9 @@ static int ceph_parse_mount_param(struct fs_context *fc,
> param->string = NULL;
> break;
> case Opt_mds_namespace:
> + if (!param->string)
> + return invalfc(fc, "Bad value '%s' for mount option '%s'\n",
> + param->string, param->key);
> if (!namespace_equals(fsopt, param->string, strlen(param->string)))
> return invalfc(fc, "Mismatching mds_namespace");
> kfree(fsopt->mds_namespace);
BTW, did you hit any crash issue when testing this ?
$ ./bin/mount.ceph :/ /mnt/kcephfs -o mds_namespace=
<5>[ 375.535442] ceph: module verification failed: signature and/or
required key missing - tainting kernel
<6>[ 375.698145] ceph: loaded (mds proto 32)
<3>[ 375.801621] ceph: Bad value for 'mds_namespace'
From my test, the 'fsparam_string()' has already make sure it won't
trigger the null-ptr-deref bug.
But it will always make sense to fix it in ceph code with your patch.
- Xiubo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists