linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] perf record: Fix event fd races

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAP-5=fWUrwQ187O7d0incvRFQ7RT+1viG30k+F1ZEEU3BEFeFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 23 Oct 2022 22:33:30 -0700
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc:     Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
        Anand K Mistry <amistry@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf record: Fix event fd races

On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 7:56 PM Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 06:10:24PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > The write call may set errno which is problematic if occurring in a
> > function also setting errno. Save and restore errno around the write
> > call.
> >
> > done_fd may be used after close, clear it as part of the close and
> > check its validity in the signal handler.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > index 52d254b1530c..e128b855ddde 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ static int record__pushfn(struct mmap *map, void *to, void *bf, size_t size)
> >  static volatile int signr = -1;
> >  static volatile int child_finished;
> >  #ifdef HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT
> > -static int done_fd = -1;
> > +static volatile int done_fd = -1;
>
> Here is a bit suspecious for adding volatile qualifier.  See the
> document: process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst.
>
> I know the document is mainly for kernel programming, but seems to me
> it's also valid for C programming in userspace.
>
> I not sure what's the purpose for adding volatile for done_fd, if we
> really have concern for reading any stale value for done_fd, should we
> use WRITE_ONCE/READ_ONCE?

We could just switch to C11 and stdatomic. The volatile is consistent
with the code above and more consistent with the expectation of
writing to a variable that is read in a signal handler.

Thanks,
Ian

> The rest changes look good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Leo
>
> >  #endif
> >
> >  static void sig_handler(int sig)
> > @@ -661,19 +661,24 @@ static void sig_handler(int sig)
> >
> >       done = 1;
> >  #ifdef HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT
> > -{
> > -     u64 tmp = 1;
> > -     /*
> > -      * It is possible for this signal handler to run after done is checked
> > -      * in the main loop, but before the perf counter fds are polled. If this
> > -      * happens, the poll() will continue to wait even though done is set,
> > -      * and will only break out if either another signal is received, or the
> > -      * counters are ready for read. To ensure the poll() doesn't sleep when
> > -      * done is set, use an eventfd (done_fd) to wake up the poll().
> > -      */
> > -     if (write(done_fd, &tmp, sizeof(tmp)) < 0)
> > -             pr_err("failed to signal wakeup fd, error: %m\n");
> > -}
> > +     if (done_fd >= 0) {
> > +             u64 tmp = 1;
> > +             int orig_errno = errno;
> > +
> > +             /*
> > +              * It is possible for this signal handler to run after done is
> > +              * checked in the main loop, but before the perf counter fds are
> > +              * polled. If this happens, the poll() will continue to wait
> > +              * even though done is set, and will only break out if either
> > +              * another signal is received, or the counters are ready for
> > +              * read. To ensure the poll() doesn't sleep when done is set,
> > +              * use an eventfd (done_fd) to wake up the poll().
> > +              */
> > +             if (write(done_fd, &tmp, sizeof(tmp)) < 0)
> > +                     pr_err("failed to signal wakeup fd, error: %m\n");
> > +
> > +             errno = orig_errno;
> > +     }
> >  #endif // HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -2834,8 +2839,12 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
> >
> >  out_delete_session:
> >  #ifdef HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT
> > -     if (done_fd >= 0)
> > -             close(done_fd);
> > +     if (done_fd >= 0) {
> > +             fd = done_fd;
> > +             done_fd = -1;
> > +
> > +             close(fd);
> > +     }
> >  #endif
> >       zstd_fini(&session->zstd_data);
> >       perf_session__delete(session);
> > --
> > 2.38.0.135.g90850a2211-goog
> >