[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac39c3e6-8328-af47-c812-1632fddbbcfd@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:03:03 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: david@...hat.com, ziy@...dia.com, apopple@...dia.com,
jingshan@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: migrate: Fix return value if all subpages of
THPs are migrated successfully
On 10/24/2022 9:56 AM, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 11:41 AM Andrew Morton
>> <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:16:23 +0800 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> When THP migration, if THPs are split and all subpages are migrated successfully
>>>> , the migrate_pages() will still return the number of THP that were not migrated.
>>>> That will confuse the callers of migrate_pages(), for example, which will make
>>>> the longterm pinning failed though all pages are migrated successfully.
>>>>
>>>> Thus we should return 0 to indicate all pages are migrated in this case.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This had me puzzled for a while. I think this wording is clearer?
>>>
>>> : During THP migration, if THPs are not migrated but they are split and all
>>> : subpages are migrated successfully, migrate_pages() will still return the
>>> : number of THP pages that were not migrated. This will confuse the callers
>>> : of migrate_pages(). For example, the longterm pinning will failed though
>>> : all pages are migrated successfully.
>>> :
>>> : Thus we should return 0 to indicate that all pages are migrated in this
>>> : case.
>>>
>>> This is a fairly longstanding problem? No Fixes: we can identify?
>>
>> It doesn't seem like a long standing issue. It seems like commit
>> b5bade978e9b ("mm: migrate: fix the return value of migrate_pages()")
>> fixed one problem, but introduced this new one IIUC.
>>
>> Before this commit, the code did:
>>
>> nr_failed += retry + thp_retry;
>> rc = nr_failed;
>>
>> But retry and thp_retry were actually reset for each retry until the
>> last one. So as long as there is no permanent migration failure and
>> THP split failure, nr_failed should be 0 IIUC. TBH the code is a
>> little bit hard to follow, please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> I think that you are correct. We can added
>
> Fixes: b5bade978e9b ("mm: migrate: fix the return value of migrate_pages()")
I think so too. Thanks Yang and Ying for pointing it out.
>
>>> Did you consider the desirability of a -stable backport?
>
> I think this can be backport to -stable.
Agree.
Andrew, could you help to add the Fixes tag and cc -stable? Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists