[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0acba21-647f-c031-4fd3-5c2a37d63812@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:30:51 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: clean up device-tree parsing
On 24/10/2022 12:00, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Since the QMP driver split there will be at most a single child node so
> drop the obsolete iteration construct.
>
> While at it, drop the verbose error logging that would have been
> printed also on probe deferrals.
>
> Note that there's no need to check if there are additional child nodes
> (the kernel is not a devicetree validator), but let's return an error if
> there are no child nodes at all for now.
>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists