linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/10] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: clean up device-tree parsing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:30:51 +0300
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: clean up device-tree parsing

On 24/10/2022 12:00, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Since the QMP driver split there will be at most a single child node so
> drop the obsolete iteration construct.
> 
> While at it, drop the verbose error logging that would have been
> printed also on probe deferrals.
> 
> Note that there's no need to check if there are additional child nodes
> (the kernel is not a devicetree validator), but let's return an error if
> there are no child nodes at all for now.
> 

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry