linux-kernel - Re: [driver-core:driver-core-testing] BUILD SUCCESS 59789f3418dd3c0a187490d49e900a59a5c8d732

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a762dca8-2458-c40b-7a35-80971c46ac84@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2022 09:10:53 +0800
From:   "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [driver-core:driver-core-testing] BUILD SUCCESS
 59789f3418dd3c0a187490d49e900a59a5c8d732



On 10/24/2022 3:52 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 10:43:07PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 02:33:40PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 08:03:57AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>>>> tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git driver-core-testing
>>>> branch HEAD: 59789f3418dd3c0a187490d49e900a59a5c8d732  device property: Constify parameter in device_dma_supported() and device_get_dma_attr()
>>>>
>>>> Unverified Warning (likely false positive, please contact us if interested):
>>>>
>>>> drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c:155 iio_hwmon_probe() warn: could not determine type of argument 4
>>>
>>> Andy, this is due to your changes, here's the offending code:
>>>
>>> 	sname = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pfwP", dev_fwnode(dev));
>>>
>>> Now that dev_fwnode() is an inline function, the compiler is confused as
>>> to what function to select?  Maybe, I don't know, it seems odd, can you
>>> look into it?
>>
>> Hmm... I can't reproduce on my side.
>> Any (additional) information about compiler, architecture, etc?
> 
> I found the original report, but I don't see how to extract the defconfig /
> config it used. Can you send that file to me?
> 

Hi Andy,

The original report can be found at 
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild@lists.01.org/thread/VE7CMY7FVIPYWHL4XMOCFWCNYTGZSTKP/

and config file can be downloaded from 
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild@lists.01.org/message/VE7CMY7FVIPYWHL4XMOCFWCNYTGZSTKP/attachment/2/config.ksh

Best Regards,
Rong Chen