lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3e809ff2-6afe-4a8f-bb64-80b3f0ad3885@app.fastmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:24:05 +0200
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "Damien Le Moal" <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Ben Dooks" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
        "Simtec Linux Team" <linux@...tec.co.uk>,
        "Sergey Shtylyov" <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
        "Hannes Reinecke" <hare@...e.de>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/21] pata: remove samsung_cf driver

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022, at 00:41, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 10/22/22 05:27, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> 
>> This device was only used by the smdk6410 board file that is now
>> gone, so the driver can be removed as well.
>
> This patch does not apply to the for-6.2 branch of libata tree. I can fix
> that easily, but I am concerned about the fact that this deletes the
> header file include/linux/platform_data/ata-samsung_cf.h, which has some
> function declarations for gpio used under arch/arm/mach-s3c. So If I apply
> this before you queue the other patches for this driver in for-next, we
> may endup with build failures. No ?

Right, that was a mistake on my end. I had tested the full 98-patch
series in sequence and assumed that the driver removal would be
fine to apply separately. I'll just merge this one through the
SoC tree then. I have double-checked the pbk3710 and palmld
drivers, and those should not have a problem like this one.
I still need to send the palmld driver, as the mach-pxa series
had some unrelated issues.

    Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ