| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20221024161213.3221725-2-senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 01:12:08 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] zsmalloc: turn zspage order into runtime variable
zsmalloc has 255 size classes. Size classes contain a number of zspages,
which store objects of the same size. zspage can consist of up to four
physical pages. The exact (most optimal) zspage size is calculated for
each size class during zsmalloc pool creation.
As a reasonable optimization, zsmalloc merges size classes that have
similar characteristics: number of pages per zspage and number of
objects zspage can store.
For example, let's look at the following size classes:
class size almost_full almost_empty obj_allocated obj_used pages_used pages_per_zspage freeable
..
94 1536 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
100 1632 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
..
Size classes #95-99 are merged with size class #100. That is, each time
we store an object of size, say, 1568 bytes instead of using class #96
we end up storing it in size class #100. Class #100 is for objects of
1632 bytes in size, hence every 1568 bytes object wastes 1632-1568 bytes.
Class #100 zspages consist of 2 physical pages and can hold 5 objects.
When we need to store, say, 13 objects of size 1568 we end up allocating
three zspages; in other words, 6 physical pages.
However, if we'll look closer at size class #96 (which should hold objects
of size 1568 bytes) and trace get_pages_per_zspage():
pages per zspage wasted bytes used%
1 960 76
2 352 95
3 1312 89
4 704 95
5 96 99
We'd notice that the most optimal zspage configuration for this class is
when it consists of 5 physical pages, but currently we never let zspages
to consists of more than 4 pages. A 5 page class #96 configuration would
store 13 objects of size 1568 in a single zspage, allocating 5 physical
pages, as opposed to 6 physical pages that class #100 will allocate.
A higher order zspage for class #96 also changes its key characteristics:
pages per-zspage and objects per-zspage. As a result classes #96 and #100
are not merged anymore, which gives us more compact zsmalloc.
Let's take a closer look at the bottom of /sys/kernel/debug/zsmalloc/zram0/classes:
class size almost_full almost_empty obj_allocated obj_used pages_used pages_per_zspage freeable
...
202 3264 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
254 4096 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
...
For exactly same reason - maximum 4 pages per zspage - the last non-huge
size class is #202, which stores objects of size 3264 bytes. Any object
larger than 3264 bytes, hence, is considered to be huge and lands in size
class #254, which uses a whole physical page to store every object. To put
it slightly differently - objects in huge classes don't share physical pages.
3264 bytes is too low of a watermark and we have too many huge classes:
classes from #203 to #254. Similarly to class size #96 above, higher order
zspages change key characteristics for some of those huge size classes and
thus those classes become normal classes, where stored objects share physical
pages.
We move huge class watermark with higher order zspages.
For order 3, huge class watermark becomes 3632 bytes:
class size almost_full almost_empty obj_allocated obj_used pages_used pages_per_zspage freeable
...
202 3264 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
211 3408 0 0 0 0 0 5 0
217 3504 0 0 0 0 0 6 0
222 3584 0 0 0 0 0 7 0
225 3632 0 0 0 0 0 8 0
254 4096 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
...
For order 4, huge class watermark becomes 3840 bytes:
class size almost_full almost_empty obj_allocated obj_used pages_used pages_per_zspage freeable
...
202 3264 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
206 3328 0 0 0 0 0 13 0
207 3344 0 0 0 0 0 9 0
208 3360 0 0 0 0 0 14 0
211 3408 0 0 0 0 0 5 0
212 3424 0 0 0 0 0 16 0
214 3456 0 0 0 0 0 11 0
217 3504 0 0 0 0 0 6 0
219 3536 0 0 0 0 0 13 0
222 3584 0 0 0 0 0 7 0
223 3600 0 0 0 0 0 15 0
225 3632 0 0 0 0 0 8 0
228 3680 0 0 0 0 0 9 0
230 3712 0 0 0 0 0 10 0
232 3744 0 0 0 0 0 11 0
234 3776 0 0 0 0 0 12 0
235 3792 0 0 0 0 0 13 0
236 3808 0 0 0 0 0 14 0
238 3840 0 0 0 0 0 15 0
254 4096 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
...
TESTS
=====
1) ChromeOS memory pressure test
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our standard memory pressure test, that is designed with the reproducibility
in mind.
zram is configured as a swap device, lzo-rle compression algorithm.
We captured /sys/block/zram0/mm_stat after every test and rebooted
device.
Columns per (Documentation/admin-guide/blockdev/zram.rst)
orig_data_size mem_used_total mem_used_max pages_compacted
compr_data_size mem_limit same_pages huge_pages
ORDER 2 (BASE)
10353639424 2981711944 3166896128 0 3543158784 579494 825135 123707
10168573952 2932288347 3106541568 0 3499085824 565187 853137 126153
9950461952 2815911234 3035693056 0 3441090560 586696 748054 122103
9892335616 2779566152 2943459328 0 3514736640 591541 650696 119621
9993949184 2814279212 3021357056 0 3336421376 582488 711744 121273
9953226752 2856382009 3025649664 0 3512893440 564559 787861 123034
9838448640 2785481728 2997575680 0 3367219200 573282 777099 122739
ORDER 3
9509138432 2706941227 2823393280 0 3389587456 535856 1011472 90223
10105245696 2882368370 3013095424 0 3296165888 563896 1059033 94808
9531236352 2666125512 2867650560 0 3396173824 567117 1126396 88807
9561812992 2714536764 2956652544 0 3310505984 548223 827322 90992
9807470592 2790315707 2908053504 0 3378315264 563670 1020933 93725
10178371584 2948838782 3071209472 0 3329548288 548533 954546 90730
9925165056 2849839413 2958274560 0 3336978432 551464 1058302 89381
ORDER 4
9444515840 2613362645 2668232704 0 3396759552 573735 1162207 83475
10129108992 2925888488 3038351360 0 3499597824 555634 1231542 84525
9876594688 2786692282 2897006592 0 3469463552 584835 1290535 84133
10012909568 2649711847 2801512448 0 3171323904 675405 750728 80424
10120966144 2866742402 2978639872 0 3257815040 587435 1093981 83587
9578790912 2671245225 2802270208 0 3376353280 545548 1047930 80895
10108588032 2888433523 2983960576 0 3316641792 571445 1290640 81402
First, we establish that order 3 and 4 don't cause any statistically
significant change in `orig_data_size` (number of bytes we store during
the test), in other words larger zspages don't cause regressions.
T-test for order 3:
x order-2-stored
+ order-3-stored
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|+ + + + x x + x x + x+ x|
| |________________________AM__|_________M_____A____|__________| |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 7 9.8384486e+09 1.0353639e+10 9.9532268e+09 1.0021519e+10 1.7916718e+08
+ 7 9.5091384e+09 1.0178372e+10 9.8074706e+09 9.8026344e+09 2.7856206e+08
No difference proven at 95.0% confidence
T-test for order 4:
x order-2-stored
+ order-4-stored
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| + |
|+ + x +x xx x + ++ x x|
| |__________________|____A____M____M____________|_| |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 7 9.8384486e+09 1.0353639e+10 9.9532268e+09 1.0021519e+10 1.7916718e+08
+ 7 9.4445158e+09 1.0129109e+10 1.001291e+10 9.8959249e+09 2.7947784e+08
No difference proven at 95.0% confidence
Next we establish that there is a statistically significant improvement
in `mem_used_total` metrics.
T-test for order 3:
x order-2-usedmem
+ order-3-usedmem
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|+ + + x ++ x + xx x + x x|
| |_________________A__M__|____________|__A________________| |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 7 2.9434593e+09 3.1668961e+09 3.0256497e+09 3.0424532e+09 73235062
+ 7 2.8233933e+09 3.0712095e+09 2.9566525e+09 2.9426185e+09 84630851
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-9.98347e+07 +/- 9.21744e+07
-3.28139% +/- 3.02961%
(Student's t, pooled s = 7.91383e+07)
T-test for order 4:
x order-2-usedmem
+ order-4-usedmem
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| + x |
|+ + + x ++ x x * x x|
| |__________________A__M__________|_____|_M__A__________| |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 7 2.9434593e+09 3.1668961e+09 3.0256497e+09 3.0424532e+09 73235062
+ 7 2.6682327e+09 3.0383514e+09 2.8970066e+09 2.8814248e+09 1.3098053e+08
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-1.61028e+08 +/- 1.23591e+08
-5.29272% +/- 4.0622%
(Student's t, pooled s = 1.06111e+08)
Order 3 zspages also show statistically significant improvement in
`mem_used_max` metrics.
T-test for order 3:
x order-2-maxmem
+ order-3-maxmem
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|+ + + x+ x + + + x x x x|
| |________M__A_________|_|_____________________A___________M____________| |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 7 3.3364214e+09 3.5431588e+09 3.4990858e+09 3.4592294e+09 80073158
+ 7 3.2961659e+09 3.3961738e+09 3.3369784e+09 3.3481822e+09 39840377
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-1.11047e+08 +/- 7.36589e+07
-3.21017% +/- 2.12934%
(Student's t, pooled s = 6.32415e+07)
Order 4 zspages, on the other hand, do not show any statistically significant
improvement in `mem_used_max` metrics.
T-test for order 4:
x order-2-maxmem
+ order-4-maxmem
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|+ + + x x + + x + * x x|
| |_______________________A___M________________A_|_____M_______| |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 7 3.3364214e+09 3.5431588e+09 3.4990858e+09 3.4592294e+09 80073158
+ 7 3.1713239e+09 3.4995978e+09 3.3763533e+09 3.3554221e+09 1.1609062e+08
No difference proven at 95.0% confidence
Overall, with sufficient level of confidence order 3 zspages appear to be
beneficial for these particular use-case and data patterns.
Rather expectedly we also observed lower numbers of huge-pages when zsmalloc
is configured with order 3 and order 4 zspages, for the reason already
explained.
2) Synthetic test
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test untars linux-6.0.tar.xz and compiles the kernel.
zram is configured as a block device with ext4 file system, lzo-rle
compression algorithm. We captured /sys/block/zram0/mm_stat after
every test and rebooted VM.
orig_data_size mem_used_total mem_used_max pages_compacted
compr_data_size mem_limit same_pages huge_pages
ORDER 2 (BASE)
1691807744 628091753 655187968 0 655187968 59 0 34042 34043
1691803648 628089105 655159296 0 655159296 60 0 34043 34043
1691795456 628087429 655151104 0 655151104 59 0 34046 34046
1691799552 628093723 655216640 0 655216640 60 0 34044 34044
ORDER 3
1691787264 627781464 641740800 0 641740800 59 0 33591 33591
1691795456 627794239 641789952 0 641789952 59 0 33591 33591
1691811840 627788466 641691648 0 641691648 60 0 33591 33591
1691791360 627790682 641781760 0 641781760 59 0 33591 33591
ORDER 4
1691807744 627729506 639627264 0 639627264 59 0 33432 33432
1691820032 627731485 639606784 0 639606784 59 0 33432 33432
1691799552 627725753 639623168 0 639623168 59 0 33432 33433
1691820032 627734080 639746048 0 639746048 61 0 33432 33432
Order 3 and order 4 show statistically significant improvement in
`mem_used_total` metrics.
T-test for order 3:
x order-2-usedmem-comp
+ order-3-usedmem-comp
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|++ x|
|++ x|
|AM A|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 4 6.551511e+08 6.5521664e+08 6.5518797e+08 6.5517875e+08 29795.878
+ 4 6.4169165e+08 6.4178995e+08 6.4178176e+08 6.4175104e+08 45056
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-1.34277e+07 +/- 66089.8
-2.04947% +/- 0.0100873%
(Student's t, pooled s = 38195.8)
T-test for order 4:
x order-2-usedmem-comp
+ order-4-usedmem-comp
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|+ x|
|+ x|
|++ x|
|A| A|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 4 6.551511e+08 6.5521664e+08 6.5518797e+08 6.5517875e+08 29795.878
+ 4 6.3960678e+08 6.3974605e+08 6.3962726e+08 6.3965082e+08 64101.637
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-1.55279e+07 +/- 86486.9
-2.37003% +/- 0.0132005%
(Student's t, pooled s = 49984.1)
Order 3 and order 4 show statistically significant improvement in
`mem_used_max` metrics.
T-test for order 3:
x order-2-maxmem-comp
+ order-3-maxmem-comp
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|++ x|
|++ x|
|AM A|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 4 6.551511e+08 6.5521664e+08 6.5518797e+08 6.5517875e+08 29795.878
+ 4 6.4169165e+08 6.4178995e+08 6.4178176e+08 6.4175104e+08 45056
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-1.34277e+07 +/- 66089.8
-2.04947% +/- 0.0100873%
(Student's t, pooled s = 38195.8)
T-test for order 4:
x order-2-maxmem-comp
+ order-4-maxmem-comp
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|+ x|
|+ x|
|++ x|
|A| A|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 4 6.551511e+08 6.5521664e+08 6.5518797e+08 6.5517875e+08 29795.878
+ 4 6.3960678e+08 6.3974605e+08 6.3962726e+08 6.3965082e+08 64101.637
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-1.55279e+07 +/- 86486.9
-2.37003% +/- 0.0132005%
(Student's t, pooled s = 49984.1)
This test tends to benefit more from order 4 zspages, due to test's data
patterns.
Data patterns that generate a considerable number of badly compressible
objects benefit from higher `huge_class_size` watermark, which is achieved
with order 4 zspages.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
---
include/linux/zsmalloc.h | 13 ++++++++
mm/zsmalloc.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/zsmalloc.h b/include/linux/zsmalloc.h
index 2a430e713ce5..2110b140e0fa 100644
--- a/include/linux/zsmalloc.h
+++ b/include/linux/zsmalloc.h
@@ -33,6 +33,19 @@ enum zs_mapmode {
*/
};
+#define ZS_PAGE_ORDER_2 2
+#define ZS_PAGE_ORDER_3 3
+#define ZS_PAGE_ORDER_4 4
+
+/*
+ * A single 'zspage' is composed of up to 2^N discontiguous 0-order (single)
+ * pages. ZS_MAX_PAGE_ORDER defines upper limit on N, ZS_MIN_PAGE_ORDER
+ * defines lower limit on N. ZS_DEFAULT_PAGE_ORDER is recommended value.
+ */
+#define ZS_MIN_PAGE_ORDER ZS_PAGE_ORDER_2
+#define ZS_MAX_PAGE_ORDER ZS_PAGE_ORDER_4
+#define ZS_DEFAULT_PAGE_ORDER ZS_PAGE_ORDER_2
+
struct zs_pool_stats {
/* How many pages were migrated (freed) */
atomic_long_t pages_compacted;
diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
index 6645506b0b14..6ffa32b8b6c8 100644
--- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
@@ -74,12 +74,7 @@
*/
#define ZS_ALIGN 8
-/*
- * A single 'zspage' is composed of up to 2^N discontiguous 0-order (single)
- * pages. ZS_MAX_ZSPAGE_ORDER defines upper limit on N.
- */
-#define ZS_MAX_ZSPAGE_ORDER 2
-#define ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE (_AC(1, UL) << ZS_MAX_ZSPAGE_ORDER)
+#define ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE (_AC(1, UL) << ZS_MAX_PAGE_ORDER)
#define ZS_HANDLE_SIZE (sizeof(unsigned long))
@@ -124,10 +119,8 @@
#define ISOLATED_BITS 3
#define MAGIC_VAL_BITS 8
-#define MAX(a, b) ((a) >= (b) ? (a) : (b))
-/* ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE must be multiple of ZS_ALIGN */
-#define ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE \
- MAX(32, (ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE << PAGE_SHIFT >> OBJ_INDEX_BITS))
+#define ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE 32U
+
/* each chunk includes extra space to keep handle */
#define ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
@@ -141,12 +134,10 @@
* determined). NOTE: all those class sizes must be set as multiple of
* ZS_ALIGN to make sure link_free itself never has to span 2 pages.
*
- * ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE and ZS_SIZE_CLASS_DELTA must be multiple of ZS_ALIGN
- * (reason above)
+ * pool->min_alloc_size (ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE) and ZS_SIZE_CLASS_DELTA must
+ * be multiple of ZS_ALIGN (reason above)
*/
#define ZS_SIZE_CLASS_DELTA (PAGE_SIZE >> CLASS_BITS)
-#define ZS_SIZE_CLASSES (DIV_ROUND_UP(ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE - ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE, \
- ZS_SIZE_CLASS_DELTA) + 1)
enum fullness_group {
ZS_EMPTY,
@@ -230,12 +221,16 @@ struct link_free {
struct zs_pool {
const char *name;
- struct size_class *size_class[ZS_SIZE_CLASSES];
+ struct size_class **size_class;
struct kmem_cache *handle_cachep;
struct kmem_cache *zspage_cachep;
atomic_long_t pages_allocated;
+ u32 num_size_classes;
+ u32 min_alloc_size;
+ u32 max_pages_per_zspage;
+
struct zs_pool_stats stats;
/* Compact classes */
@@ -523,15 +518,15 @@ static void set_zspage_mapping(struct zspage *zspage,
* classes depending on its size. This function returns index of the
* size class which has chunk size big enough to hold the given size.
*/
-static int get_size_class_index(int size)
+static int get_size_class_index(struct zs_pool *pool, int size)
{
int idx = 0;
- if (likely(size > ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE))
- idx = DIV_ROUND_UP(size - ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE,
+ if (likely(size > pool->min_alloc_size))
+ idx = DIV_ROUND_UP(size - pool->min_alloc_size,
ZS_SIZE_CLASS_DELTA);
- return min_t(int, ZS_SIZE_CLASSES - 1, idx);
+ return min_t(int, pool->num_size_classes - 1, idx);
}
/* type can be of enum type class_stat_type or fullness_group */
@@ -591,7 +586,7 @@ static int zs_stats_size_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
"obj_allocated", "obj_used", "pages_used",
"pages_per_zspage", "freeable", "objs_per_zspage");
- for (i = 0; i < ZS_SIZE_CLASSES; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < pool->num_size_classes; i++) {
class = pool->size_class[i];
if (class->index != i)
@@ -777,13 +772,13 @@ static enum fullness_group fix_fullness_group(struct size_class *class,
* link together 3 PAGE_SIZE sized pages to form a zspage
* since then we can perfectly fit in 8 such objects.
*/
-static int get_pages_per_zspage(int class_size)
+static int get_pages_per_zspage(struct zs_pool *pool, int class_size)
{
int i, max_usedpc = 0;
/* zspage order which gives maximum used size per KB */
int max_usedpc_order = 1;
- for (i = 1; i <= ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE; i++) {
+ for (i = 1; i <= pool->max_pages_per_zspage; i++) {
int zspage_size;
int waste, usedpc;
@@ -1410,7 +1405,7 @@ unsigned long zs_malloc(struct zs_pool *pool, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
/* extra space in chunk to keep the handle */
size += ZS_HANDLE_SIZE;
- class = pool->size_class[get_size_class_index(size)];
+ class = pool->size_class[get_size_class_index(pool, size)];
/* class->lock effectively protects the zpage migration */
spin_lock(&class->lock);
@@ -1959,7 +1954,7 @@ static void async_free_zspage(struct work_struct *work)
struct zs_pool *pool = container_of(work, struct zs_pool,
free_work);
- for (i = 0; i < ZS_SIZE_CLASSES; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < pool->num_size_classes; i++) {
class = pool->size_class[i];
if (class->index != i)
continue;
@@ -2108,7 +2103,7 @@ unsigned long zs_compact(struct zs_pool *pool)
struct size_class *class;
unsigned long pages_freed = 0;
- for (i = ZS_SIZE_CLASSES - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+ for (i = pool->num_size_classes - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
class = pool->size_class[i];
if (class->index != i)
continue;
@@ -2152,7 +2147,7 @@ static unsigned long zs_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrinker,
struct zs_pool *pool = container_of(shrinker, struct zs_pool,
shrinker);
- for (i = ZS_SIZE_CLASSES - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+ for (i = pool->num_size_classes - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
class = pool->size_class[i];
if (class->index != i)
continue;
@@ -2199,6 +2194,22 @@ struct zs_pool *zs_create_pool(const char *name)
if (!pool)
return NULL;
+ pool->max_pages_per_zspage = 1U << ZS_MIN_PAGE_ORDER;
+ /* min_alloc_size must be multiple of ZS_ALIGN */
+ pool->min_alloc_size = (pool->max_pages_per_zspage << PAGE_SHIFT) >>
+ OBJ_INDEX_BITS;
+ pool->min_alloc_size = max(pool->min_alloc_size, ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE);
+
+ pool->num_size_classes =
+ DIV_ROUND_UP(ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE - pool->min_alloc_size,
+ ZS_SIZE_CLASS_DELTA) + 1;
+
+ pool->size_class = kmalloc_array(pool->num_size_classes,
+ sizeof(struct size_class *),
+ GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
+ if (!pool->size_class)
+ goto err;
+
init_deferred_free(pool);
rwlock_init(&pool->migrate_lock);
@@ -2213,17 +2224,17 @@ struct zs_pool *zs_create_pool(const char *name)
* Iterate reversely, because, size of size_class that we want to use
* for merging should be larger or equal to current size.
*/
- for (i = ZS_SIZE_CLASSES - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+ for (i = pool->num_size_classes - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
int size;
int pages_per_zspage;
int objs_per_zspage;
struct size_class *class;
int fullness = 0;
- size = ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE + i * ZS_SIZE_CLASS_DELTA;
+ size = pool->min_alloc_size + i * ZS_SIZE_CLASS_DELTA;
if (size > ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE)
size = ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE;
- pages_per_zspage = get_pages_per_zspage(size);
+ pages_per_zspage = get_pages_per_zspage(pool, size);
objs_per_zspage = pages_per_zspage * PAGE_SIZE / size;
/*
@@ -2307,7 +2318,7 @@ void zs_destroy_pool(struct zs_pool *pool)
zs_flush_migration(pool);
zs_pool_stat_destroy(pool);
- for (i = 0; i < ZS_SIZE_CLASSES; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < pool->num_size_classes; i++) {
int fg;
struct size_class *class = pool->size_class[i];
@@ -2327,6 +2338,7 @@ void zs_destroy_pool(struct zs_pool *pool)
}
destroy_cache(pool);
+ kfree(pool->size_class);
kfree(pool->name);
kfree(pool);
}
--
2.38.0.135.g90850a2211-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists